User:Slakr/Sandbox
23:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| cell 1 | cell 2 | cell 3 |
| extlink | cell5 | cell6 |
asdf
Icons
[edit]
Cool icons
[edit]
Prettytable
[edit]| Stuff | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
| in progress
|
done
|
planned
|
unfavored
|
| temporarily broken
|
canceled
| ||
| R and D | |||
| deferred
|
expedited
|
stalled
|
merged
|
| snagged
|
need consensus
| ||
*Gasp!* You never got a cookie!
[edit]
Nice job on Wikipedia:Home page. :) It looks like you never got one of our "welcome cookies" even though you've been here for a few months already making other great contributions. So, I figure, I might as well a fresh plate of them here-- even though it's a couple months too late. Cheers, and keep up the great work =)
{{subst:User:Slakr/Sandbox/Weird|subst=subst:}}
Frequent regexes
[edit]^http://en\.wikipedia\.org/wiki/(.*)$
AFD reason
[edit]
Thank you for trying to help improve Wikipedia. However, I recently found one of your articles for deletion nomination reasons potentially inflammatory and/or insulting to other editors. Keep in mind that these comments may be considered a personal attack on the page's creator or the other editors which might have contributed to the page; moreover, it could be seen as disruptive. Please try to keep AFD nomination reasons simple and guideline/policy-based. Thanks a million. =) --slakr\ talk / 03:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
warns
[edit]
*Gasp!* You never got a cookie!
[edit]Nice job on Wikipedia:Home page. :) It looks like you never got one of our "welcome cookies" even though you've been here for a few months already making other great contributions. So, I figure, I might as well a fresh plate of them here-- even though it's a couple months too late. Cheers, and keep up the great work =)
{{subst:User:Slakr/Sandbox/Weird|subst=subst:}}
Frequent regexes
[edit]^http://en\.wikipedia\.org/wiki/(.*)$
Your recent editing history at Main Page shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Away msg
[edit]
|
slakr is totally scoping out hotties on a nice, warm beach. He should be back around December 25th. Leave a message and he will zOMG!!! I need urgent assistance!!!1!! — banana? — kiwi? |
Busy msg
[edit]
|
slakr's life is currently frolicking with chaos, so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance— that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =) zOMG!!! I need urgent assistance!!!1!! — banana? — kiwi? |
Userboxen
[edit] | This admin welcomes uninvolved admins to revert or alter his admin actions as needed. |
Slakr
[edit]test