User:SirlupinwatsonIII

User information

• - Bonjour! Hi there! Hola! If you send me a message on Telegram or LinkedIn or even on X, I will buy you a coffee! If you can break my code, I will buy you 2 coffee!
• - Name: Sir Watson³ III
• - Location: North America, Canada, World
• - Currently working in a group: I don't actually, or does not consider this, as working! Each day is a unique experience!
• - What do you dislike? Not having learning maths before or earlier!
• - What do you disagree with? With what can be optimized or improved
• - What do you enjoy to do: Music: playing, listening, creating, piano, or most instruments

User interest

• Cartography¹
• Languages²
• Science³
• Quantum physics⁴
• ${\ce {CO2 + C -> 2 CO}}$

One song a day - Piano please!

1 bit + 1 qubit = ?
(x + y + z) = ♪⁴
x = cartography
y = languages
z = science
if x + y = (z³)
let ♪ = (x¹ + y² + z³)⁴
print(♪);

Got some Maths ᚯ

$4\lambda +\lambda =1{}_{p}F_{q}\left({a_{1},\ldots ,a\qquad b_{p} \atop b_{1},\ldots ,b_{q}};z\right)\leftrightarrows \left({\alpha _{1},\ldots ,a_{p} \atop b_{1},\ldots ,b_{q}};z\right)$

The Beast as Beauty and the Beauty as Beast 400 BC 495 BC 2024 In Philo

• [1] Common shared memories allows surprisingly encyclopedic, or numerous anagrams as amalgam, objectivism or verdictum, as this must be done, or should it? Affordable balance, consciously maladroit, the truth, and trust must be correlated, and not revealed, to understand the contingence of shared knowledge, hence not to be decisive or positioning themselves as judge, or in favor of, as with their minimalist temperament, neither are characterised or could enjoy self-assessment. Damoclès... "Ipso Facto", or "Ipsos Ipsus", In coda venenum, In dubis abstinee and In vino veritas...

1. Marc-Aurèle, Pythagore & Socrate, ni sophiste, ni démocratisé, eurent des pensées lors des diminis dies natalis, et fort probablement que beaucoup d'entre-nous, ce pencheront sur les mêmes sujets, à savoir, la conception

__Dos__

Matrix (plural) & Numbers as Melody or Symphony

• [2] Curiously or as strange it seems to be, numbers or alphabeticals and numerics values, are similarly or can be, the product of a symphony, or a melody in some case, (depending on your mood-it can also be hardcore electro house music!) moving trough a sort of cylinder flowing in a wave, shaped uniquely in a form of twisted spiral (Visualizing La Courbe de Bézier in a twisted cylinder... funny!) At this stage, I imagine the Fibonacci sequence in a geometric cube, from there you can approximately view what I am referring at. During each measure or actions, a product is shown or understood, as this definition might be assimilated to ordinaries features, you can also see it as a "Matrix". To demonstrate a representation, humans, computer, animals or other forms of life, objects and such, distinctively and each by their own, could potentially "value" their own matrix. In a circumstances where you would be required to demonstrate your valorous honor, or even highlight your exponential experience in a particular field, a "Matrix" with horizontal (stoicism) (groups, union, diploma, class, etc.) or vertial (laisism) (level of functions, structural title, class, etc.) is born. It is important to understand and mention, in any context, if one or another is pursuing a goal, and are in need of a specific class or title, they will ironically, begin their journey and follow a path (non-inclusive or unique) to achieve or satisfy, a fraction of the aforementioned and specifically from that interface or complexity layer, the said matrix. Each matrix, university, country, financial system, microchip, symphony, or even the simpliest natural element such as a biological leaf, have their own and programmable (or not...) matrix.

Explorum in primo

• [3] Once, a stranger said: (Civilismus aristocratia es elegantia in definiendis vocabulis locupletissimis)

• [4] Zero and Olim [0][1] To use a reference as a point, coordination and accuracy, could be defined or viewed, and is "in facto", hazardous in term of results. After additions (copy-paste), it became predictible, and is almost, a formulaic variable. Even after repetitive attemps, by comparison, theory, must relatively remain, theory. Select your starting point: [0,1]-[0][1]-[00]-[1] if you make an effort, with logic expression, you presume; 0, 1 (fair?) else, why would you use 1 as a starting point if 0 is your first choice?

• [5] Check, & mate, the King and Queen... During a chess contest, a "battle" or simply said a 'game(<)' have particularly common terms in conjunction, or while concurrently indicating their relationship and intention, mutual interest emerge. Effective measures must be taken in both direction (or side...) as the point of friction is adjacent or critical, sums or results could effectively 'end' one of another intentions or projection. In many case, as we seen from prior experiments, the "forefront" is an adaptative and robust methodology to increase and maximise retention, while on the opposite, reducing the exponential, attract various "bounding" effects. Again, as this 'game' is played, and time evolve dramatically, you can and should, envision or perceive, that each partition or side, are in fact, competing on the same board. You could potentially view this as, they don't have anything shared, but substantially, they do! In rare occasions, or ever and anon, reinforcements are in dire need, and one must use something like a magic 'mushroom', to regenerate, or as we say and do during a chess game, move your pion at the end (or try to?), ...if you can make it, got a Queen? Or... Singular value, depend on overall sums and products, as if 1, is equal to 0, where value, is relative to shared variables.