User:Sasharoach/User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)/Sasharoach Peer Review

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Isdewell

Link to draft you're reviewing

User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes

Lead

Guiding questions:

• The lead has been updated to reflect the new content
• The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
• The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections
• The lead does not include information that is not present in the article
• The lead is concise and not overly detailed

Content

Guiding questions:

• The content added is relevant to the topic
• The content added is up-to-date
• There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong
• The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• The content added is neutral
• There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
• There are not viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented
• The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information
• The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say
• The sources are thorough - i.e. they reflect the available literature on the topic
• The sources are current
• The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors and include historically marginalized individuals where possible- though only two sources
• There are not better sources available- the book provides comprehensive information and touches on all subjects related to the cafe
• Links work

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Content added is well-written - i.e. It is concise, clear, and easy to read
• The content added does not contain grammatical or spelling errors
• The content added is well-organized - i.e It is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• The article does not include images that enhance understanding of the topic
• Images are not well captioned- no images
• Images do not adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations- no images
• Images are not laid out in a visual way- no images

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• The article meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. It is supported by 2 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject
• The list of sources is not greatly exhaustive- there are only two, however the book is the best source for this topic and contains an influx of information
• The article follows the patterns of other similar articles
• The article links to other articles

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• The content added has made it more complete- especially since this is a new article so all content is new on Wikipedia
• Strengths: Organized, thorough, links to other articles and sources
• Content can be improved by adding images to make it more interesting and visually appealing