User:Sasharoach/User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)/Sasharoach Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Isdewell
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- n/a
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The lead has been updated to reflect the new content
- The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
- The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections
- The lead does not include information that is not present in the article
- The lead is concise and not overly detailed
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content added is relevant to the topic
- The content added is up-to-date
- There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong
- The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content added is neutral
- There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
- There are not viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented
- The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information
- The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say
- The sources are thorough - i.e. they reflect the available literature on the topic
- The sources are current
- The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors and include historically marginalized individuals where possible- though only two sources
- There are not better sources available- the book provides comprehensive information and touches on all subjects related to the cafe
- Links work
Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Content added is well-written - i.e. It is concise, clear, and easy to read
- The content added does not contain grammatical or spelling errors
- The content added is well-organized - i.e It is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- The article does not include images that enhance understanding of the topic
- Images are not well captioned- no images
- Images do not adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations- no images
- Images are not laid out in a visual way- no images
For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- The article meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. It is supported by 2 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject
- The list of sources is not greatly exhaustive- there are only two, however the book is the best source for this topic and contains an influx of information
- The article follows the patterns of other similar articles
- The article links to other articles
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content added has made it more complete- especially since this is a new article so all content is new on Wikipedia
- Strengths: Organized, thorough, links to other articles and sources
- Content can be improved by adding images to make it more interesting and visually appealing