User:Salma yassin 2000/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Feminism and modern architecture
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
answer: I have chosen this article because it relates feminism to architecture and that architecture is not limited to female architects.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? not much
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? consice

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? not much
Is the content up-to-date? it was created in 2008 and was last edited on January 2018
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes there is some missing content

Is the article neutral? no it is biased toward feminism
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? its is generally biased towards female architects and their outstanding abilities in architecture
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? it tries to persuade the reader that females have a different look and view on how houses can be built with better and more suitable ways that fit the whole family.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes, it has reliable references
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes, they contain the houses mentioned above in the article for further reading
Are the sources current? no they are old
Check a few links. Do they work? yes they do

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? no very clear
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no grammatical or spelling errors
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? it is organized but does not reflect the major poits of the topic, it gives examples right away without explaining the main purpose clearly

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no, the only image is the female symbol
Are images well-captioned? there are no images
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? there are no images
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? there are no images

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? the talk page is empty
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? cannot find the rating. it is a wikitext
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? we haven't talked about it yet

What is the article's overall status? not so good
What are the article's strengths? examples and references backing up these examples
How can the article be improved? more explanation and clarification about the main purpose if the topic
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? poorly developed

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~