User:Sal.hammad21/Cancel culture
Cancel Culture Edit Summary
[edit]Part I want to edit:
A poll of American registered voters conducted in July 2020 shows that cancel culture, defined as "the practice of withdrawing support for (or canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive", was common. 40% of respondents said they had withdrawn support from public figures and companies, including on social media, because they had done or said something considered objectionable or offensive, 8% having engaged in this often. Behavior differed according to age, with a majority (55%) of voters 18 to 34 years old saying they have taken part in cancel culture, while only about a third (32%) of voters over 65 said they had joined a social media pile-on. Attitude towards the practice was mixed, with 44% of respondents saying they disapproved of cancel culture, 32% who approved, and 24% who didn't know or had no opinion. Furthermore, 46% believed cancel culture had gone too far, with only 10% thinking it hadn't gone far enough. However, a majority (53%) believed that people should expect social consequences for expressing unpopular opinions in public, especially those that may be construed as deeply offensive to other people.
Edited
A poll of American registered voters conducted in July 2020 shows that cancel culture, was common. Cancel Culture is defined as "the practice of withdrawing support for (or canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive" (Need Citation). Accoding to a study done by______ 40% of respondents said they had withdrawn support from public figures and companies, including on social media, because they had done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Accordingly, 8% having engaged in this often. In the study, it was noted that behavior differed according to age. 55% of voters who are aged 18 to 34 years old stated that they have taken part in cancel culture, while only about a third (32%) of voters over 65 said they had joined a social media pile-on. Attitude towards the practice was mixed, with 44% of respondents saying they disapproved of cancel culture, 32% who approved, and 24% who didn't know or had no opinion. Furthermore, 46% believed cancel culture had gone too far, with only 10% thinking it hadn't gone far enough. The study also found that, a majority (53%) believed that people should expect social consequences for expressing unpopular opinions in public, especially those that may be construed as deeply offensive to other people. NEED'S CITATION OR NAME OF STUDY
Social Status Shaming
[edit]Social status shaming is a form of online shaming that involves making fun of and bullying others online due to their socioeconomic status. [1] This phenomenon is centered around using someones income, social status, health, and influence to subject them certain types of bullying and online criticism. [2] It is often utilized as a vessel for social control among classes, and has been regarded as one of the most effective models in which to examine social status and its influence on controlling those below you. [2] In the digital world we live in, there is a social standard that we all fall into and try our best to achieve. Whether that be being super fit, having a Lamborghini, owning a Mansion, or all of the above, we all are painted this idealistic photo in the online ecosystem. Thus, social status shaming is a form of Social exclusion, where if you aren't as rich as me, then you will be subjected to some form of bullying and criticism so that I shall retain social control. [3]
References
[edit][3] Great scholarly article focused online shaming through social media and how our privacy has been exploited
[1] Book focused on economic status and its affect on online shaming. How we can use this to bridge the gap between online shaming and belief
[2] Article examines the efficacy of online shaming and use it understand social control. "Social control is the process of regulating individual or group behaviour, to encourage conformity and obedience."
- ^ a b Hou, Yubo; Jiang, Tonglin; Wang, Qi (2017-11). "Socioeconomic status and online shaming: The mediating role of belief in a just world". Computers in Human Behavior. 76: 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.003.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b c Suhaimi, Nurul Shuhada; Mahmood, Anida; Yahya, Nur Asma; Zain, Fazlin Mohamed; Hashim, Haswira Nor Mohamad (2018-12-30). "The Efficacy of Online Shaming as a Modality for Social Control: A Survey amongst UiTM Law Students". International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8 (12): Pages 903–911. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5083. ISSN 2222-6990.
- ^ a b Laidlaw, Emily (2017-02-08). "Online Shaming and the Right to Privacy". Laws. 6 (1): 3. doi:10.3390/laws6010003. ISSN 2075-471X.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)