User:Sahartaleb/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (link) J-Museum
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This article is concerned with a topic I am really interested in, so I would enjoy reading and evaluating it.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
Lead evaluation
[edit]The lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly defines the topic "J-Museum" briefly, mentioning when it was opened and other information about it generally. It also provides the reader with an overview about the titles he/she will encounter later in the article. Everything mentioned in the lead is further elaborated in the content. The lead is precisely written so that it contains only the necessary information, so it's not overly detailed.
Content
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Content evaluation
[edit]The content of the article is directly related to the topic as it explains everything related to it starting from its history to the current structures. All information included are valid and up-to-date and nothing is irrelevant or missing.
Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The article is fully neutral. All points are equally presented, and this article doesn't favor any idea over the other or persuades reader toward a certain point.
Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Reliable sources are used to cite all information mentioned in this article, so it's credible. Information in the sources reflect the written in the article, they go back to 7 years back but are still valid. They do work.
Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]The article is very simple and written in a language everyone can understand without any difficulties. Grammatically, it does not contain any mistakes. It would have been more clearer if the title "Exhibitions and Structures" was divided into two different parts.
Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]The article includes 3 different images related to "J-Museum", each with an illustration downwards. It also includes the location of the museum on the map. All images follow Wikipedia's copyright regulations. They are well-captioned, so they give an idea about what the museum looks like.
Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]No conversations are taking place behind the scenes on the talk page related to this article. It is rated as a C-class article. It is part of the WikiProject Italy, WikiProject Museums, and WikiProject Football.
Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]The article is well-written, it is well developed, it is concise, and it includes most of the information a person might like to know about the topic. The timings the museum is open at could be added to further help those who want to visit it for example, in addition to the entry price. This article is well-developed but needs some revision.
Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: