User:Ryans.lewis3365

I created this wikipwedia account because I came up with some phrases that I put in "my talk". I thought these phrases would be very useful for everybody. I came up with these phrases to explain the activities of my conscious mind.(in english) Because many teachings have been regarded as religions and because I found a bias eminating from some part of each teaching in the world I noticed that christianity in america had often exibited such a bias. By describing oneself as christian the assumption would be that all information that I reference would be limited to the bible. I recently decided that "Conscious Social Science" was simply the activity of all supposed "religions". Although, as a "Conscious Social Scientist" I understand that all of the teachings in the world are the part of the same religion that have determined there origins of practice with labels such as - IE - christian is to the bible - I would like to get some feedback.

Psychological Yoga MAP- A tool for Conscious Social Science

The Road to the Mountain of Meditation is traveled by first understanding the properties then applying a theory/conscious interpretation/s to form or understand different dimensions of reality by remaining perpetually conscious of all the variables or aspects pertaining to the meditation/study/experiment. - Psychological Yoga

The Road- Understanding the Properties of the meditation or preditermined values such as definitions of words and such information that has been determined as "true information". - Properties

The Mountain of Meditation- All of the values/preditermined definitions being subjected to different forms of interpretations that may include theory of belief or theory based on fact or both.

Theory regarding psychological Yoga is usually considered a belief before proven true or false unless all your information to build a theory is proved unbiased and scientific because much of psychology is based on theory. IE- Theory of realitivity and perpetual motion are applicapble comparisons for both psychological yoga and perpetual consciousness.

Therefore one might apply a theoery based on intuition and by definition is still a belief that hasn't been referenced as a fact until the theory is justified as more factual then the present practice. IE- writing belief down and prooving through a proccess of elimination.

This doesn't determine one as having no faith. This determines one as participating in the practice of "Conscious Social Science".

This tool can serve as useful with determining or discerning logic regarding variables within conversations and or statements that induce or produce questionable dimensions of interpretations.

Thank you-Ryan

proposed simple definition

The scientist that studied the concept of GOD built a theological view by acknowledging the truths/facts associated within the properties of the meditation and remained consciously rational about the social construct. -religion or the religious practices in America

Religion- The social/physical interaction between beings/entities.

SOURCE-I find definitions of words and use them by their definitions.

Atheist- ONE who does not acknowledge the concept of GOD as representation as a deity that is an equal metaphore regarding the physical state of the universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Athiest- Why does a definition matter? Wikipedia isn't the place for original ideas, we reflect what verifiable and reliable sources say. ted--Ryans.lewis3365 (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)der (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

RYAN- I like to make a definition of a word that is based from a logical standpoint because if I don't I sound vague and create confusing conversation. Specifically, "belief" is not a logical variable in concerns with defining athiesm because, I am logically acknowledging the concept regarding the universe and how GOD is a word used to describe the universe as a deity that we are physically a part of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- How's that? GoodDay (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ryan- The Deity (Universe) is physical and you can measure it with science. The Diety (GOD)is physical and you can measure it with science, IE- I am a part of GOD and/or the Universe- this is a concept of understanding words and meanings of them- no beliefs required. An atheist does not acknowledge that concept... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- How does this relate to Wikipedia? This sounds like something that should be on your Facebook page or blog. tedder (talk) 17:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)You can't measure the physical properties of seomthing that doesn't exist. GoodDay (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

RYAN -This is the wikipedia talk page for atheism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- It's not a forum though. PS: You should be signing your post. GoodDay (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ryan- I just started and haven't figured how to sign the post but what else would you have this page for? I have a proposed definition--Ryans.lewis3365 (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)The universe exists and is by definition a deity so belief is not the issue when defining the word atheist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- Atheists don't believe in deities. GoodDay (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC

┌─────────────────────────────────┘

Ryan-why is belief so important to atheists? do you know what alogical means?

Atheist- What belief? We know there's no such thing as deities. GoodDay (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ryan- what is your definition of a deity?

Ryan- If the universe can be defined as a deity then a deity must exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans.lewis3365 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC) See intro at Deity. -- GoodDay (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- The universase is merely outer space. A vast nothingness filled with stars, planets, comets, asteroids etc etc. GoodDay (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ryan- You have justified my definition and you must be an "atheist"--Ryans.lewis3365 (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheist- I'm an atheist. The universe isn't a deity. GoodDay (talk) 17:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

LikeUnlike · · Share · Delete Write a comment... Press Shift+Enter to start a new line.