Jump to content

User:Robminchin/draft third oldest university section

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History of the foundations

[edit]

The five year period from 1828 to 1833 saw an unprecedented expansion of higher education in England, with three university-level institutions opening. The first was UCL, founded as a joint stock company under the name London University in 1826, which opened in 1828. Whether a university could be founded in this manner was hotly debated, with the institution being widely considered illegitimate, and it was denied official recognition. King's College was founded as a counter to UCL and was granted a charter in 1829, helped by not claiming to be a university or intending to award degrees. Durham was designed from its conception in 1831 to be a full university with degree-awarding powers but did not initially seek a royal charter. The university was instead founded under the authority of an Act of Parliament passed in 1832 and opened in 1833. In 1836 the University of London was established to solve the problem of having two competing colleges in London and to clarify their status, with UCL taking the name "University College, London". For the first time, England had higher education institutions besides Oxford and Cambridge that would maintain a sustained existence.[1]: 1-2 [2]

University College London

[edit]

Following attempts by Henry Brougham in 1825 to establish the institution via a royal charter, which the government refused, or by an act of parliament, which was blocked by the influence of Oxford and Cambridge,[3]: 21  UCL was established on 11 February 1826 as a joint-stock company under the name of "University of London".[4]: 63  The foundation stone for the main building was laid by Prince Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex, a brother of King George IV, in 1827[4]: 24  and the college opened for teaching on 1 October 1828.[4]: 36 

UCL applied for a charter in late 1830 or early 1831 that would grant it "Incorporation as an University, with all the privileges incident to that title", but without an explicit mention of degree-awarding power.[1]: 89 [5] In February of that year it was reported that "a charter, which now only awaits the royal signature, is to be granted to the University of London".[6] but following opposition from Oxford and Cambridge the application for the charter stalled. The application was renewed in 1833, but again stalled with Oxford and Cambridge's opposition being joined by the London medical schools.[5] In 1835 the House of Commons voted in favour of a petition to the king to grant a charter along the lines of that approved in 1831. However, the government chose instead to grant UCL a charter as a college, rather than as a university, and to found the University of London as a separate body.

Lord Brougham, the chair of UCL's council, told a meeting of the proprietors that accepting this charter meant surrendering their claim to be a university, saying "it went a little to his heart … to sink into a college when they had originally started as an university" but that "for his own part he would rather accept it", which the proprietors voted unanimously to do.[7] It was described as "a barren collegiate Charter" by William Tooke, who had led the parliamentary campaign for UCL's recognition as a university,[8] and John Robson, Secretary of UCL in the 1870s, told the Royal Commission on Scientific Instruction and the Advancement of Science in 1872 that "in March 1835, the House of Commons, by a large majority—246 to 136—adopted an address to the King, praying him to grant a charter of incorporation to 'the University of London,' which would have enabled it to grant degrees; and, consequently, that what the institution was asked to surrender in favour of the University founded in 1837 [sic], was not merely its designation, but the position which it had acquired through that vote of the House of Commons, and the importance of which had been distinctly recognized by successive Governments."[9] An official history issued by the University of London in 1912 as a supplement to the calendar stated that "The friends and supporters of University College cordially welcomed the Government plan, although it gave them far less than they had at first demanded, and although acceptance of it implied the renunciation of all claim to exercise the full functions of a University, and placed them on a footing of equality with some younger and less important institutions."[10] In November 1838, the first UCL students matriculated in the new University of London and the first London degrees were awarded in May 1839.[4]: 92-93 

UCL was not granted university status and the attendant right of awarding degrees during the 19th century,[11] and it does not feature on 19th-century lists of universities in England.[12] However the use of "university" in its name was known to cause confusion: in an article for the Journal of Education in 1888, Edith Wilson stated: "There are five, and only five, universities in England. (I begin by starting this explicitly because the name University College so often misleads even those familiar with the language of the educational world.) These five are Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, London, and Victoria."[13]

After the University of London was reconstituted as a federal body in 1900, UCL surrendered its property and independence and was merged into the University of London under the 1905 University College London (Transfer) Act, which went into effect in 1907. It was not until 1977 that UCL once more became an autonomous institute,[14][15] and not until 1993 that it (along with the other colleges) received government funding from HEFCE as an independent institution rather than getting an allocation from the University of London's grant.[16] UCL received degree awarding powers on 27 September 2005,[17] and the first UCL degrees were awarded in summer 2008.[18] In 2019 UCL, along with King's and 10 other colleges of the University of London, applied for university status following the passing of the University of London Act 2018.[19]

King's College London

[edit]

King's College London was established by Royal Charter on 14 August 1829 as "King's College, London", a reaction to UCL with the aim of providing an Anglican education. KCL was able to receive its charter quickly in part because it was not seeking to become a university, and in part because of its outlook on religion being an essential part of education – both in sharp contrast to its rival.[20] The existence of King's also gave the establishment another excuse to deny UCL university status: it would mean doing the same for King's, creating two universities for one city. This eventually led to the compromise of forming the University of London to examine students from both colleges.[21] It was chartered as a college, not a university; the term "university" does not appear in the charter.[22] The 150th anniversary history of the college states that: "No attempt was to be made to form a University which had the power of conferring its own degrees: the task of King’s College was to prepare men for a commercial career, or for other universities if they sought after a degree or ordination."[23]

The college opened its doors to students in 1831. Students at King's either left for degrees at Oxford and Cambridge, gained medical qualifications through the Royal Colleges, or (from 1834) took the Associate of King's College (first awarded in June 1835); the college did not award degrees of its own.[24][25][26]

Following the establishment of the University of London in 1836, King's became an associated college of that university, allowing its students to sit examinations for London degrees. However, students were still encouraged to take the AKC rather than the London degree – which was also open to "godless" UCL students.[27] It also made agreements with Durham and Edinburgh to allow King's College London students to take degrees at those universities with only one year of residence.[28]

King's surrendered its autonomy to be merged into the University of London from 1910 to 1980,[29][30] and was funded as an independent institution rather than through the University of London after 1993.[16] King's gained degree awarding powers in July 2006,[31] awarding its first degrees in summer 2008.[32] In 2019 King's, along with UCL and 10 other colleges of the University of London, applied for university status following the passing of the University of London Act 2019.[19]

Durham University

[edit]

Durham University had its formal beginnings in an act of the Chapter of Durham Cathedral on 21 September that established an "Academical Institution or College or University", followed by a second act of Chapter on 28 September 1831, which resolved to accept "A plan of an academic institution, to be called Durham College, in connexion with the Dean and Chapter".[33][34]: 23  By December of that year, the "college" was being advertised as a "university", with the prospectus appearing in London newspapers.[35] On 4 July 1832, Parliament passed "An Act to enable the Dean and Chapter of Durham to appropriate Part of the Property of their Church to the Establishment of a University in connexion therewith for the Advancement of Learning".[36] Students were admitted to degree programmes from 28 October 1833, with the first calendar (autumn 1833) advertising the institution as "University of Durham founded by Act of Chapter with the Consent of the Bishop of Durham 28 September 1831. Constituted a University by Act of Parliament 2nd and 3rd William IV., Sess. 1831-2."[34]: 239  However, the act did not directly found the university, rather it authorised the cathedral chapter to establish the university. This it did formally with an Act of Chapter on 4 April 1834, which resolved "that the Academical Institution or College or University established by Act of Chapter, 21st September 1831, be constituted a University".[1]: 88 [34]: 27 

Following its opening in 1833, the university awarded its first Licence in Theology (which only required a one-year course for those who were already graduates of Oxford, Cambridge or Dublin) in 1834.[37] The first exams for the Bachelor of Arts were held in 1836 and the first exams for the Master of Arts in 1837.[38] Following the practice of Oxford, the first BAs were conferred a year later, in 1837.[1]: 100 [39]: 72  The first honorary degree, a Doctor of Civil Law, was conferred on Earl Grey in 1838 for his support as Prime Minister of the establishment of the university.[40]

The university was referred to as "the University of Durham" in two public acts of parliament prior to the granting of its charter: the Municipal Corporations Act 1835,[41] and the Established Church Act 1836.[42] Durham was incorporated by a royal charter granted on 1 June 1837,[43] which explicitly referred to the university already having "established under our Royal sanction, and the authority of our Parliament",[43] and the first degrees were conferred on 8 June 1837.[44] This charter did not establish the university but rather confirmed the university status of the existing body.[1]: 100  The explanatory memorandum to the 1907 University of Durham Act states that "The University was established in 1834 by a Statue of the dean and chapter of the cathedral church of Durham, made in pursuance of an Act of Parliament of 1832, and was incorporated by Royal Charter in 1837 under the name of the 'Warden, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Durham.'"[45]

The Attorneys and Solicitors Act 1837, which extended various privileges related to admission to the legal profession of Oxford, Cambridge and Dublin graduates to Durham and London,[34]: 32 [39]: 72 [46] similarly confirmed that Durham was established as a university under the authority of the 1832 act and that the effect of the 1837 charter was to incorporate the pre-existing university, in contrast to London which waas established by royal charter. The act states "And whereas … a Body Politic and Corporate by the Name of the University of London has been constituted by the Royal Charter of His late Majesty King William the Fourth, and an University having been founded and established in connexion with the Cathedral Church at Durham under the Authority of an Act passed in the Second and Third years of the Reign of His said late Majesty … And whereas since the passing of the said last-mentioned Act a Royal Charter of Incorporation had been granted to the University of Durham".[47]

University of London

[edit]

The University of London was established and chartered in 1836 as a degree awarding body. It received a second charter in 1837, a third in 1858 and a fourth in 1863, under which it is now incorporated. It matriculated is first students in November 1838 (from UCL and King's College London) and awarded its first degrees in May 1839 (again to students from UCL and King's College London).[4]: 92-93  In 1900 it was reconstituted as a federal university by statutes drawn up under the University of London Act 1898, including as schools of the university both UCL and King's College London, along with a number of other colleges in London.[48]

London was incorporated under its 1836 charter "during Our Royal Will and Pleasure". Sources give differing interpretations on what this meant, with some saying the charter expired on the death of William IV (20 June 1837),[49][50] and others that it may never have been valid but if it were it would have expired 6 months after the king's death (i.e. 20 December 1837).[51][52] The university was re-incorporated by a second Royal Charter on 5 December 1837. This date is sometimes given in Victorian sources as the founding of the University,[9][53] and is the date used as the date of creation in the supplemental charter of 1850 and the charters of 1858 and 1863.[54]

As founded, the University of London was "an examining board appointed by the government",[55] and the lack of teaching in the university led to criticism that it was not a true university. Henry Wace, Principal of King's College London told a Royal Commission said in 1888 that he "had two … objections to the title of the University of London: one, that it is not a University, and the other that it is not of London".[56] In a similar vein, Karl Pearson, a professor at UCL, said that "[t]o term the body which examines at Burlington House a University is a perversion of language, to which no charter or Act of Parliament can give a real sanction".[57] Some modern historians have taken a similar line, describing the University of London of that era as "a Government department, in the form of a board of examiners with power to matriculate students and award degrees … it had the trappings of a university, but not its most obvious function – it did not teach,"[58] and as "what would today be called a quango".[59] The problems thrown up by the lack of teaching in the university led eventually to its reconstitution as a federal teaching and research institution in 1900.[60]

Degree awarding powers

[edit]

Related to the question of university status was the question of degree awarding powers. At this period, "the absence of a Royal Charter was generally held to deny degree-giving powers to a body with no outside authority for calling itself a university".[3]: 49  Thus, although various objections were raised to the granting of a charter to UCL, all of the opposing parties agreed that a grant of university title would confer the right to award degrees as incident upon that title.[5] Without an official grant of university title, UCL did not grant degrees, and a proposal in 1830 to introduce a degree of "M. Med. et Chir. U. L." was not carried out,[3]: 49  although legal controls on unrecognised degrees were not introduced until the Education Reform Act 1988.[61] When Brougham (then Lord Chancellor) asked during the debate on UCL's application for a charter in the Privy Council in 1834, "Pray, Mr. Bickersteth, what is to prevent the London University [i.e. UCL] granting degrees now?" he received the reply: "The universal scorn and contempt of mankind."[62]

William Tooke, who led the parliamentary campaign for the recognition of UCL as the University of London, told the House of Commons in 1833 that: "It is not generally known, that no university whatever is entitled to confer degrees, by grant of any Charter whatever, the claim so to do being considered as incident to the name and title of University".[63] Similarly, Sir Charles Wetherell, arguing against the grant of a university charter to UCL before the Privy Council in 1834 said that: "It will be necessary to examine this subject a little more minutely, and particularly with reference to the power of conferring degrees, and the nature of a university. The only place where I can find any legal discussion on matters so little brought under consideration as these, is the argument of Mr. Attorney General Yorke, in Dr. Bentley's case, which is reported in 2nd Lord Raymond, 1345 ... In this proposition of Mr. Yorke two principles are laid down. The first is that 'granting degrees flows from the Crown;' and the second is, that if 'a University be erected, the power of granting degrees is incidental to the grant.' ... The subject matter granted, is the power of covering degrees; an emanation, as Mr. Yorke expresses it, from the Crown. It is the concession of this power that constitutes the direct purpose and the essential character of a University."[64][note 1]

However, disputes over Durham's powers demonstrated that it was not clear that being granted the status of a university conferred degree awarding powers.[1]: 90  The liberal Sir William Hamilton, wrote a response to Wetherell's argument before the Privy Council in the Edinburgh Review arguing that historically the power to award specific degrees was explicitly granted, and thus the recognition of an institution as a university did not, in itself, grant any power to award degrees: "But when it has been seriously argued before the Privy Council by Sir Charles Wetherell, on behalf of the English Universities … that the simple fact of the crown incorporating an academy under the name of university, necessarily, and in spite of reservations, concedes to that academy the right of granting all possibly degrees; nay when (as we are informed) the case itself has actually occurred, — the "Durham University," inadvertently, it seems, incorporated under that title, being in the course of claiming the exercise of this very privilege as a right, necessarily involved in the public recognition of the name — in these circumstances we shall be pardoned a short excursus, in order to expose the futility of the basis on which this mighty edifice is erected."[65]

Hamilton went on to conclude: "In like manner, in all the Universities throughout Europe, which were not merely privileged, but created by bull and charter, every liberty was conferred not as an incident, through implication, but by express concession. And this in two ways:—For a University was empowered, either by an explicit grant of certain enumerated rights, or by bestowing on it implicitly the known privileges enjoyed by certain other pattern Universities. These modes were frequently conjoined, but we make bold to say, that there is not to be found, throughout Europe, one example of a University erected without the grant of determinate privileges,—far less of a University, thus erected, enjoying, through this omission, privileges of any, far less of every other.—In particular, the right of granting degrees, and that in how many faculties, must (in either way) be expressly conferred."[66] However, historians have not agreed with this conclusion. Hastings Rashdall states that "the special privilege of the jus ubique docendi [the precursor to the modern degree] … was usually, but not quite invariably, conferred in express terms by the original foundation-bulls; and was apparently understood to be involved in the mere act of erection even in the rare cases where it is not expressly conceded".[67] Patrick Zutshi, Keeper of Manuscripts and University Archives in Cambridge University Library, writes that "Cambridge never received from the papacy an explicit grant of the ius ubique docendi, but it is generally considered that the right is implied in the terms of John XXII’s letter of 1318 concerning Cambridge’s status as a studium generale."[68]

William van Mildert, the Bishop of Durham, had said during the passage of the act in 1832 that ""...[N]or ought the privilege of conferring degrees, if hereafter committed to the University by charter, to be thrown open indiscriminately to non-conformists of every description, in common with members of the Established Church."[69] In a similar vein, William Clayton Walters, a Newcastle barrister who the university consulted with, said in 1832 that there was nothing the university wanted from a royal charter at that time "except the power to grant degrees".[1]: 91  However, by 1833 Thorp wrote to Van Mildert that "the Dean and Chapter are anxious to ascertain the place and value of the Degrees in due time to be conferred by virtue of the Act of Parliament which constitutes Durham a University".[1]: 92  Subsequently, the university announced in 1835 that it would confer degrees, after taking further legal advice from Walters as to whether it had the authority to do so under the Act of Parliament, and just over a month later passed a "fundamental statute" that included provision for the awarding of degrees.[1]: 93 [39]: 58 

After Van Mildert's death in February 1836, Thorp wrote to the Prime Minister, Lord Melbourne, noting that degree awarding powers might be "inherent in a University instituted by the highest authority of the nation", but that it would be desirable to have either a charter or a legal declaration that one was unnecessary (no response is recorded).[1]: 95 [70] The university again sought Wetherell's counsel on the matter of the charter in March, and were advised to avoid mention of degree awarding powers but solely to seek incorporation as a university; stating that both his personal opinion and the orthodox opinion were that "the word university carries degrees".[1]: 95 [71] The petition submitted followed this advice, omitting mention of degrees and seeking only incorporation and the power to hold property.[1]: 96  The opinion of the Chapter of Durham Cathedral (the governors of the university) in 1837 remained that the university had the power to award degrees under the 1832 Act of Parliament and that, although a royal charter would enhance the perception of those degrees, the university would proceed to award degrees that year whether or not a charter was issued. However, this was not put to the test as the charter was granted.[1]: 98 

Timeline

[edit]
Year Durham London UCL King's
1826 11 February: UCL established as a joint-stock company under the name of "University of London"
1827 30 April: Foundation stone laid
1828 21 June: A public meeting chaired by the prime minister, the Duke of Wellington, resolved to found King's College
1 October: UCL opened
1829 14 August: King's College London established by royal charter
1830 Degree of M. Med. et Chir. U. L. proposed
1831 February: Newspapers reported that a charter as a university had been passed by the legal officers of the crown and was awaiting the royal signature
21 & 28 September: Durham Cathedral chapter passed acts establishing an "academical institution"
8 October: King's opened
1832 4 July: The University of Durham Act received royal assent
1833 28 October: Durham University opened and first students matriculated onto degree courses
1834 14 February: King's College council instituted the Associate of King's College
4 April: Durham Cathedral chapter passed an act constituting the academical institute founded in 1831 a university, in accordance with the University of Durham Act 1832
24 April: Renewed application for a charter as a university debated before the Privy Council
Easter Term: First examinations for and award of the Licence in Theology
1835 26 March: House of Commons voted in favour of praying the King to grant a charter to UCL as a university
13 June: Durham University announces after taking legal advice that it will confer degrees
27 June: First award of the Associate of King's College
20 July: Durham University's fundamental statute was passed by the cathedral chapter
30 July: The government announced their intention to establish "a Metropolitan University" in response to the House of Commons' prayer that UCL be granted a charter as a university, with UCL to be granted a charter as a college
1836 28 November: The University of London established by royal charter 28 November: UCL incorporated by royal charter as "University College, London"
1837 1 June: Durham incorporated by royal charter
8 June: First Durham degrees awarded
15 July: The Attornies and Solicitors Act, giving London and Durham degrees equal privilege to those of Oxford, Cambridge and Dublin, received royal assent
5 December: University of London reincorporated by a second royal charter
1838 November: First students from UCL and King's matriculate at the University of London
1839 May: First University of London degrees awarded to students from UCL and King's

References for the dates given in this table can be found in the sections above.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Matthew Andrews (1 June 2018). Universities in the Age of Reform, 1800–1870: Durham, London and King’s College. Springer.
  2. ^ Matthew Andrews (5 July 2018). "Universities in the Age of Reform". Higher Education Policy Institute.
  3. ^ a b c Negley Harte; John North; Georgina Brewis (21 May 2018). The world of UCL (4th ed.). UCL Press.
  4. ^ a b c d e Harte, Negley (1 December 2000). University of London: An Illustrated History: 1836–1986. London: A&C Black.
  5. ^ a b c University College London. Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. 1843. pp. 23–24. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  6. ^ "London University". Chester Courant. 15 February 1831. Retrieved 28 November 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive.
  7. ^ "London University". Newcastle Courant. 12 December 1831. Retrieved 13 December 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive.
  8. ^ "The Congregational magazine (formerly The London Christian Instructor)". Books.google.com.pr. 1835. p. 708. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  9. ^ a b Royal Commission on Scientific Instruction and the Advancement of Science (1872). First, supplementary, and second reports, with minutes of evidence and appendices – Evidence of John Robson, Secretary of UCL. pp. 462–466.
  10. ^ "University of London, the Historical Record: (1836-1912) Being a Supplement ... - University of London". Books.google.com.pr. 1912. p. 9. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  11. ^ Royal Commission on Scientific Instruction and the Advancement of Science (1872). First, supplementary, and second reports, with minutes of evidence and appendices – Evidence of John Robson, Secretary of UCL. pp. 462–466."Of course, the original title of University was unauthorised; it was a title which the founders of the institution had assumed, and did not confer the privileges of a University, that is to say, the power of granting degrees"
  12. ^ Listing Oxford, Cambridge, Durham and London:
    • Penny Cyclopaedia, 1843, vol. 27, p. 21;
    • Political dictionary, 1846, vol. 2, p. 861;
    • The Standard Library Cyclopedia, 1849, 1853 & 1860, vol. 4, p. 861;
    • Encyclopædia Britannica, 1860, vol. 21, p. 452;
    • The National Encyclopædia, 1867, p. 350;;
    • The People's Cyclopedia of Universal Knowledge, 1883, vol. 3, p. 1777;
    • Chambers's Encyclopædia, 1885, vol. 12, p. 138
    Listing Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, London and Victoria:
    • The Students' Journal and Hospital Gazette, 22 September 1883, p. 371;
    • Alden's Manifold Cyclopedia of Knowledge and Language, 1892, vol. 38, p. 197;
    • Johnson's Universal Cyclopedia, 1895, vol. 8, p.391
  13. ^ "Journal of Education". Books.google.com.pr. 1888. p. 424. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  14. ^ "Landmarks". University College London. Archived from the original on 30 January 2008. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  15. ^ "UCL Library Services: UCL Archives". Archives.ucl.ac.uk. 1931-09-24. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  16. ^ a b Grant, Malcolm (March 2005), The future of the University of London: a discussion paper from the Provost of UCL (PDF), pp. 3–6
  17. ^ "UCL granted degree awarding powers". UCL. 27 September 2005. Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  18. ^ "UCL unveils new academic dress". University College London. 2008-03-26. Retrieved 2014-12-29.
  19. ^ a b "UCL statement on University of London Act 2018". 11 March 2019. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference Cobb Hearnshaw 1929 67–68 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Banerjee, Jacqueline. "The University of London: The Founding Colleges". Retrieved 26 May 2007.
  22. ^ Cobb Hearnshaw, F.J. (1929). The Centenary History of King's College London. London: G.G. Harrap & Company. pp. 70–74.
  23. ^ Gordon Huelin (1978). King's College London, 1828-1978. London : University of London, King's College. p. 5.
  24. ^ Fossey John Cobb Hearnshaw (1929). The Centenary History of King's College, London, 1828-1928. G.G. Harrap. pp. 111–112.
  25. ^ "FAQs 4. Did all students sit University of London examinations?". 175 years King's College: In the beginning... King's College London. Archived from the original on 2007-05-22. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
  26. ^ "King's College London". The Evening Chronicle. 30 June 1835. Retrieved 27 October 2021 – via British Newspaper Archive.
  27. ^ "A brief history of the Associateship of Kings College" (PDF). AKC Alumni Group. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  28. ^ John Parker (1896). The Calendar of King's College, London. King's College London.
  29. ^ "University of London, the Historical Record: (1836-1912) Being a Supplement ... - University of London". Books.google.com.pr. 1912. p. 23. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  30. ^ "King's College London Act 1997". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  31. ^ "King's College London - King's Governance". Kcl.ac.uk. 2009-06-30. Archived from the original on 21 September 2015. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  32. ^ "King's College London – Lions on the catwalk". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 2014-12-29.
  33. ^ Durham University Commissioners (1863). Minutes of Evidence taken before the Durham University Commissioners. House of Commons. p. 119.
  34. ^ a b c d J. T. Fowler. Durham university; earlier foundations and present colleges. F. E. Robinson & co., 1904. Retrieved 2014-12-26.
  35. ^ "London Standard, 14 December 1831". London Standard. 14 December 1831. Retrieved 2014-12-30.
  36. ^ Parliament, Great Britain (1844). "Acts Relating to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England: With Appendix ... - Great Britain. Parliament". Books.google.com. p. 389. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  37. ^ John Venn (15 May 2011) [First pub. in ten parts between 1922 and 1954]. Alumni Cantabrigienses: A Biographical List of All Known Students, Graduates and Holders of Office at the University of Cambridge, from the Earliest Times to 1900. Cambridge University Press. Thomson, George Selby p. 170.
  38. ^ The Durham University Calendar for 1837. Durham University. 1837. pp. 27–31.
  39. ^ a b c C.E. Whiting (1932). The University of Durham (1832–1932). Sheldon Press.
  40. ^ "University Intelligence". Church of England Magazine. Vol. 4. 1838.
  41. ^ Joseph Chitty (1829). "A Collection of Statutes of Practical Utility: With Notes Thereon. with ..." Books.google.co.uk. p. 225. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  42. ^ Joseph Chitty (1829). "A Collection of Statutes of Practical Utility: With Notes Thereon. with ..." Books.google.co.uk. p. 148. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  43. ^ a b ,"About Durham University: Royal Charter". Durham University. Retrieved 2014-12-26.
  44. ^ "The University: The Founding of the University". The University. Durham University. Archived from the original on 2006-06-17. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
  45. ^ "Bills, Public - Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons". Books.google.com. 1907. University of Durham Bill. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  46. ^ "Cap. 56.—An Act for amending the general Acts for the Regulation of Attorneys and Solicitors". The Monthly Law Magazine and Political Review. Vol. 1. London: A. Maxwell. 1838. pp. 247–248.
  47. ^ Britain, Great (1837). "The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland - Great Britains". Books.google.co.uk. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  48. ^ University of London (1912). University of London – The Historical Record, 1836–1912. University of London Press. pp. 7–24.
  49. ^ Harte, Negley (2010). University of London: An Illustrated History: 1836–1986. London: A&C Black. p. 90.
  50. ^ Victor Aimé Huber; Palgrave Simpson (1843). "The English Universities: From the German". Books.google.com.pr. p. 565. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  51. ^ Harriet Martineau; Charles Knight (1858). "History of the peace: pictorial history of England during the thirty years ..." Books.google.com.pr. p. 455. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  52. ^ "Penny Cyclopaedia of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge". Books.google.co.uk. 1843. p. 28. Retrieved 2015-12-05.
  53. ^ "Victorian London – Education – Universities -University of London". Retrieved 2015-01-01. "UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, SOMERSET HOUSE. A government institution, established 1837" Peter Cunningham Hand-Book of London (1850), "University of London.-- Originally incorporated by Royal Charter in the first year of the reign of her present Majesty" Charles Dickens, Jr. Dickens's Dictionary of London (1879)
  54. ^ University of London (1912). University of London – The Historical Record, 1836–1912. University of London Press. pp. 36–47.
  55. ^ F.M.G.Wilson (1995). Our Minerva: the men and politics of the University of London, 1836–1858. Athlone Press. pp. xv.
  56. ^ Harte, Negley (2010). University of London: An Illustrated History: 1836–1986. London: A&C Black. p. 120.
  57. ^ Harte, Negley (2010). University of London: An Illustrated History: 1836–1986. London: A&C Black. p. 142.
  58. ^ Wilson, F.M.G. (2004). The University of London, 1858–1900: The Politics of Senate and Convocation. Boydell Press. p. 1.
  59. ^ Thompson, F.M.L. (1990). The University of London and the World of Learning, 1836–1986. A&C Black. p. 7.
  60. ^ Wilson, F.M.G. (2004). The University of London, 1858–1900: The Politics of Senate and Convocation. Boydell Press. p. 8.
  61. ^ Sam Kiley (1 December 1988). "Bogus degrees crackdown". The Times.
  62. ^ Greville, Charles C. F. (1874). The Greville Memoirs: A Journal of the Reigns of King George IV. and King William IV. Vol III. Longmans, Green, & Co. p. 82.
  63. ^ "Hansard".
  64. ^ Charles Wetherell (1834). Substance of the Speech of Sir Charles Wetherell: Before the Lords of the Privy Council, on the Subject of Incorporating the London University. J.G. & F. Rivington. pp. 77–80.
  65. ^ Sir William Hamilton (1853). Discussions on philosophy and literature, education and university reform. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman's. p. 492. Retrieved 27 October 2021 – via Internet Archive.
  66. ^ Sir William Hamilton (1853). Discussions on philosophy and literature, education and university reform. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman's. p. 497. Retrieved 2015-12-05 – via Internet Archive.
  67. ^ Hastings Rashdall (1895). The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages: Volume 1, Salerno, Bologna, Paris. pp. 11–12.
  68. ^ Patrick Zutshi (2011). Kenneth Pennington; Melodie Harris Eichbauer (eds.). When Did Cambridge Become a Studium generale?. Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate. pp. 153–171. doi:10.1017/S0038713412001947. ISBN 9781409425748. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  69. ^ Hansard, House of Lords, 22 May 1832, col. 1215: Hansard website
  70. ^ "Calendar of the Charles Thorp Correspondence, THO/214". Durham University. Retrieved 2014-12-28.
  71. ^ "Calendar of the Charles Thorp Correspondence, THO/226". Durham University. Retrieved 2014-12-28.


Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).