User:Roarkstata/Ethnic villages of China/SallyJohnson12 Peer Review

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Roarkstata

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Roarkstata/Ethnic villages of China
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Ethnic villages of China

Evaluate the drafted changes

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The first paragraph of the article is really informative but I think it could be shorter. I think two to three sentences would be a little bit more manageable. It looks like you're planning to separate the first couple of sentences from the rest that so that's great!

Content: I like how you have the article broken up into smaller sections and it seems like all the information you have is relevant. I also really like how you talk about popular culture because I think that's an interesting topic for modern readers. I think it might be nice to know how many ethnic villages there are and how the ethnic villages work. I was also wondering about the history of how this division was created and whether there is any conflict between villages.

Tone and Balance: I think you did really well here. Your tone is neutral and there doesn't seem to be any bias. I also don't think you spent too much or too little time on any one topic.

Sources: You cited sources appropriately and credited the sources of all the information you added. I think the original creator of the article forgot to cite information in the lead section so you may need to go back and cite that if you plan to keep what was already written. You have a good references section with credible sources so this part of the article looks good!

Organization: The content is well-written and easy to read. I don't see any errors and I like how you included hyperlinks to other relevant Wikipedia articles.

Images: It looks like you added an image which is nice! It seems relevant and enhances my understanding of what these villages might look like. The caption is helpful too.

Overall Impressions: Overall, I think this looks good! The article was very short before so the information you added helps me better understand the topic. I think you did well with the sourcing, the writing style, and the division of the article into manageable sections. If I could change anything about the article, I would shorten the lead section and add a little bit more explanation about what the villages are and how they work.