User:Rmac5/Temple of Janus (Roman Forum)/SPhilSmit Peer Review

Peer review

Hello Rmac5! Overall your article was very good. It is a very interesting topic! My biggest recommendation is to work on your organization and add an origin section.

General info

• I am reviewing Rmac5 wikipedia article on the Temple of Janus.
• User:Rmac5/draft sandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

• The lead is concise and to the point. You did a wonderful job at adding more information to ensure that the information they added was discussed in the lead. While the lead was concise it needs a bit more information. For example, you stated "The Temple of Janus, although it was not a normal temple, stood in the Roman Forum near the Basilica Aemilia, along the Argiletum" I would suggest that you add a short description of why the temple was not 'normal'. In addition, I would try to use less leading or opinionative language. Maybe say, "The Temple of Janus was different from other temple because...". I would also add an outline of what you were going to discuss in the article. By outlining the sections you will help with the flow of the article.

Content

Guiding questions:

• The content in this article is generally up to date. Most of the sources are from the 1990s and 2000s. I would recommend adding some more sources to strengthen your article. In addition, a missing section of information is the origin of the temple. Who built it and why?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• The information is generally nutereal. You did a wonderful job of stating the fact without our own opinion. The only time saw a bit of leading language was in the lead when you called the temple not normal. Please see the lead evaluation to see how I recommend changing it.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• The links did not works. The sources were relevant to the topic. There was some elements, such as a sources that discusses origins of the temple and more sources about the modern ruins. Also a discussion of how they became ruins.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• The article was well written. There were no spelling mistakes. There were some grammatical error, such as sentence fragments and miss placed commons. I would recommend that you read your articles out loud and maybe have a friend read it for you. Your article needs a bit more organization and use subheading to break up the information. This will hope your article flow and make it easier for your reader to follow.

Images and Media

Guiding questions:

You did not add any media or Images.