User:Riana/RfA
Appearance
Are you a reasonably nice person? Do you communicate well? Are you fairly active? Have you been around a decent length of time? If I took you for a drive and left you in the middle of nowhere, could you find your way home? And most of all...
If the answers to all the above are 'YES!!!', I'll probably support your candidacy.
Wikipedians I have nominated for adminship
[edit]- Husond (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 82/0/2. Co-nommed with Runcorn and Mike1.
- Daveydweeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 72/0/1. Co-nommed with Spawn Man.
- James086 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 47/0/0. Co-nommed with Majorly.
- Michaelas10 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 76/2/0. Co-nommed with Arjun01.
- SpuriousQ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 60/0/0. Co-nommed with Acalamari.
- PeaceNT (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 71/1/0. Co-nommed with Majorly and Appleworm.
- Trusilver (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 89/2/5. Co-nommed with Jmlk17 and AGK.
- Flyguy649 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Successful RfA, 89/0/0. Co-nommed with Pascal.Tesson and Wizardman.
- R (talk · contribs) - Failed to reach consensus, 65/42/14/ Co-nommed with Newyorkbrad and Nihiltres.
- Kelly Martin (talk · contribs) - Unsuccessful RfA, 29/102/9. Co-nommed with Moreschi and Danny. This was quite spectacular.
- Shalom (talk · contribs) - Unsuccessful RfA. Co-nommed with Dihydrogen Monoxide and Qst.
- Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) - RfA withdrawn. Co-nommed with Anonymous Dissident.
Have offered to nominate
[edit]Looking at
[edit]No one at present. Lately my RfAs have been cursed x(
Note
[edit]Anyone nominated by Ryan Postlethwaite or Majorly was probably on my list first ;) Just kidding, guys!
Thoughts on adminship I find interesting
[edit]- ... the "doesn't need the tools" argument has been debunked time and again. No editor vitally requires sysop powers. Wikipedia vitally needs sysops and sysops vitally need mature, responsible and committed editors to be granted sysop rights so that they can stop bugging us when they need to. Pascal.Tesson 17:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC) [1]
Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 10:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |