User:Renee Sweeney/sandbox
Current Research
[edit]Most recent work has explored the extensiveness of pleiotropy and its common mechanisms. Although universal pleiotropy was modelled in early research, the advent of Sequencing in the 1970s has allowed molecular geneticists to experiment with gene manipulation and discover a new, more limited model called modular pleiotropy. This assumes that the genome is modular, and genes may affect phenotypes within their module but not in the rest of the organism.[1]
To test this, researchers have attempted to measure the "network diameter," or the number of traits on average affected by a single gene. In a study of the protein interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans, the diameter was found to be about 4-5 edges.[2] Another study used protein sequence and microarray analysis on 321 genes from eight vertebrae species, and averaged 6-7 traits.[3] Quantitative trait analysis on rodent skeletal genetics in a separate study yielded an average of 7.8 affected traits per locus.[4] Although these are merely averages and not direct experimental results, the agreement among these studies provides compelling evidence against universal pleiotropy. Still, however, certain organisms have demonstrated pleiotropy across several modules, such as Pseudomonas fluorescens, whose entire gene network could be rewired by a single nucleotide mutation.[5]
Investigations at the nucleotide level have also shed more light on the mechanisms of pleiotropy. It was concluded that the Catsup gene in the dopamine synthesis pathway is pleiotropic at the gene level, but not at the nucleotide level, which questions the unit of pleiotropic action geneticists should be focusing on.[6] In a study estimating the level of pleiotropy from the genomic sequence data of S. cerevisiae, pleiotropy was found to be highly correlated with protein interaction and biological processes, but not with the number of proteins per gene or molecular functions. This suggests that pleiotropic genes mostly produce single multifunctional products.[7] Two paralogous regulatory genes, zfl1 and zfl2, studied in maize appeared to be associated with the same suite of traits, but each gene was more strongly associated with a subset of those traits, indicating that subfunctionalization may provide an escape from antagonistic pleiotropic traits.[8] Another study which combined comparative methods, sequencing, and enzyme assays on the dihydroflavonol-4-reductase gene of Convolvulaceae came to the same conclusion. The gene had duplicated in some lineages but not others, revealing gene duplication as another escape from detrimental pleiotropic effects.[9]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Stearns, Frank W. (2016-11-16). "One Hundred Years of Pleiotropy: A Retrospective". Genetics. 186 (3): 767–773. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.122549. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 2975297. PMID 21062962.
- ^ Li, R. H., S. W. Tsaih, K. Shockley, I. M. Stylianou, J. Wergedal et al., 2006. Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PloS Genetics 2 1046–1057.
- ^ Su, Z., Y. Zeng and X. Gu, 2009. A preliminary analysis of gene pleiotropy estimated from protein sequences. J.Exp. Zool. 312B 1–10.
- ^ Wagner, G. P., J. P. Kenney-Hunt, M. Pavlicev, J. R. Peck, D. Waxman et al., 2008. Pleiotropic scaling of gene effects and the ‘cost of complexity’. Nature 452 470–472.
- ^ Maclean, R. C., G. Bell and P. B. Rainey, 2004. The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoff in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 8072–8077.
- ^ Carbone, M. A., K. W. Jordan, R. F. Lyman, S. T. Harbison, J. Leips et al., 2006. Phenotypic variation and natural selection at Catsup, a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 16 912–919.
- ^ He, X. L., and J. Z. Zhang, 2006. Toward a molecular understanding of pleiotropy. Genetics 173 1885–1891.
- ^ Bomblies, K., and J. F. Doebley, 2006. Pleiotropic effects of the duplicate maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes zfl1 and zfl2 on traits under selection during maize domestication. Genetics 172 519–531.
- ^ Des Marais, D. L., and M. D. Rausher, 2008. Escape from adaptive conflict after duplication in an anthocyanin pathway gene. Nature 454 762–766.
 | This is a user sandbox of Renee Sweeney. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |