User:Regutten/sandbox/prostatecancerscreening
When screening for prostate cancer, the PSA test may detect small cancers that would never become life-threatening, but once detected will lead to treatment. This situation, called overdiagnosis, puts men at risk for complications from unnecessary treatment such as surgery or radiation. Follow up procedures used to diagnose prostate cancer (prostate biopsy) may cause side effects, including bleeding and infection. Prostate cancer treatment may cause incontinence (inability to control urine flow) and erectile dysfunction (erections inadequate for intercourse).[1] As a result, in 2012, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer finding, "there is a very small potential benefit and significant potential harms" and concluding, "while everyone wants to help prevent deaths from prostate cancer, current methods of PSA screening and treatment of screen-detected cancer are not the answer."[2][3]
More recently, Fenton's 2018 review[4] (conducted for the USPSTF) focused on the two highest quality randomized control studies of the costs and benefits of PSA screening that have been conducted, and the findings illustrate the complex issues associated with cancer screening. Fenton reports that the screening of 1,000 men every four years for 13 years reduces mortality from prostate cancer by just one. More specifically, of those 1,000 men: 243 received an indication of cancer during PSA screening (most of whom then had a biopsy); of those, 3 had to be hospitalized for biopsy complications; 35 were diagnosed with prostate cancer (and thus the false alarm rate from the original PSA screening was >85%); of those 35, 3 avoided metastatic prostate cancer and 1 avoided death by prostate cancer while 9 developed impotence or urinary incontinence due to their treatment and 5 died due to prostate cancer despite being treated. In their 2018 recommendations, the USPSTF estimates that 20%-50% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer following a positive PSA screening have cancer that, even if not treated, would never grow, spread, or harm them [5][6]
Most North American medical groups recommend individualized decisions about screening, taking into consideration the risks, benefits, and the patients' personal preferences.[7]
- ^ "Screening for Prostate Cancer" (PDF) (consumer brochure). Understanding Task Force Recommendations. U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. May 2012.
- ^ "Screening for Prostate Cancer". U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. May 2012.
- ^ "Trends in Cancer Screening: A Conversation With Two Cancer Researchers". Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2013-04-17. Retrieved 2013-09-26.
- ^ Fenton, J.J.; Weyrich, M.S.; Durbin, S. (2018). "Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: A systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force". Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 154.
- ^ USPSTF. "USPSTF, Published Final Recommendations, Prostate Cancer Screening". U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Retrieved 31 December 2018.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
SIcancerscreening
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Gulati, Roman; Gore, John L.; Etzioni, Ruth (February 2013). "Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms". Annals of Internal Medicine. 158 (3): 145–53. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00003. PMC 3738063. PMID 23381039.