User:Raul654/Featured Articles
This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This page is for discussion of my proposal to have a "Featured Articles" section on the main page.
This is the original post to the village pump (now in the January 2004 archive):
Great new thought - I want feedback!
[edit]I just had an interesting idea and I wanted to get some feedback. On the main page, we have catagories for "In the News", "Recent Deaths", "New Articles" and "Anniversaries". The only way for a non-timely article to get put there is just after it is created.
My thought was - why not create a 5th catagory - "Featured Articles"
People could nominate articles on the discussion page (or would could have a special page just for that). That way, nontimely articles get their time on the main page too. Personally, a lot of the editing I do is on technical articles, which never makes it to the front page. I think this is a way of rewarding people who have similiar tastes. ---Raul654 10:48, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Maybe the most recent additions to Wikipedia:Brilliant prose would fit the bill? Bmills 10:50, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- or random or rotating selections from that list. Gentgeen 11:15, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
I agree. Let's add it under the anniversries bar (take out the second line); there's also space in the enclyclopedia box. --Jiang 17:08, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Look at Wikipedia: Experimental Main Page or Main Page/Temp5 for some ideas. Feel free to add interesting articles, better with commentaries ilya 22:29, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Every article in "Selected Articles" is a featured article. I don't see the point (unless it was a featured Brilliant prose article). --mav 13:16, 1 Jan 2004 (UTC)