User:RLW016/Jones Lake State Park/MamaUniversee Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes the links are relevant.
Is the content added up-to-date? The links were up to date
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? No
Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes the topics in the references that were added were really helpful and good updating the article with recent sources.
Are the sources current? Yes they are from recent websites.
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? The Sources are from government websites so they are contributed by multiple authors. Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No they don't.
Check a few links. Do they work? All links work

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The links that are added definitely helpful.
What are the strengths of the content added? Strong due
How can the content added be improved?
Content can be improved through Adding some of the information from your sources to the ecology section and geology section