User:Qfw99/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Blackpink
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
- I chose this article to evaluate because I am interested in Blackpink. I enjoy their music and would like to know more about them.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Yes
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Yes; there is one sentence when Blackpink's song "Boombayah" was mentioned, but is not mentioned later on in the article.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- I think the lead is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Yes
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- From my knowledge, there is no missing content. I do not think there is any content that is misplaced or that does not belong.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
- Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No, everything is fact based.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- No
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No, it is completely unbiased.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes
- Are the sources current?
- Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- Yes
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Yes; the article is well-written. The paragraphs are at the length were they are concise, yet also easy to read.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- There were none that caught my attention.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes; I believe the article is well-organized. It is broken into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Yes
- Are images well-captioned?
- Yes; each caption has a specific date that the picture is from.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- I believe so.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- Yes; they are not just all on one side, but placed on either sides of the paragraphs which make it more appealing to the eye.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- The only big main debate that happened during February 2019 was regarding how Blackpink's name should be written, whether it should be Blackpink or Black Pink.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- The article is rated as C-Class and is a part of a few WikiProjects, including WikiProject Biography / Musicians, WikiProject Korea, WikiProject Japan / Biography / Gaijin / Music, and WikiProject Pop music.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- It does not differ.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- The overall status is good.
- What are the article's strengths?
- One strength is that there is no bias in the entirety of the Wiki article. In addition, the paragraphs are not too long, but long enough to provide reliable information. The formatting is nicely done.
- How can the article be improved?
- I think there can be more information provided about them, but as they are a relatively new group, finding more information about them would be hard.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- I think the article is well-developed.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: