User:ProfGray/312/Lesson plan week 3
Appearance
Lesson plan: Week 3. Religions of the Hebrew Bible. Return to the course page
Monday
[edit]Review worksheet
Brief reading exercise
JSB apparatus -- intro remarks
- How to find the author of the annotations? (margin notes)
- Do the annotations reflect critical thinking?
- Source critical notes. Example 2:4b-6 as J "earth and heaven"
- ANE and comparative religion. 1:1, Nephilim as myth, 6:15
- Literary criticism and intertextual info, example on p.15
- Key concepts, e.g., covenant at 7:18
- Religious analysis, e.g., Jewish interpretations (see Genesis 12)
Coogan ch.4 -- critical theory
- Why? p.56: "the repetitions, the inconsistencies, and the contradictions"
- Doublet examples.
- Box 4.1 on p.53 God's POV and beastly pairs
- JSB p.20 at 6:19-20 Levenson sees the pairs as a contradiction
- WP example: Preparing the ark does not mention sources, yet Great Deluge section does.
- Box 4.1 on p.53 God's POV and beastly pairs
- Nuances or challenges
- Additional sources besides 4
- Hexateuch hypothesis
- What led up to each of these sources? What is a source is not ancient but antiquarian?! (56)
- Key terms and concepts
- Form criticism is mentioned (57)
- Creativity in combining the sources: redaction criticism
- Linked sources: D and Dtr, P and Ezekiel
Coogan ch.5. A few key points
- J issues
- Humans loss of easy connection to the soil
- Boundary-blurring: eat fruit to be like gods, sex with sons of God, and tower of Babel
- Wicked people, Cain, Flood, Gen. 8:21 (evil inclination)
- P issue: genealogies
- Nations of the world (fyi Japhetic theory)
Agenda: 3:10 pm
WP assignments: Now and next steps
Show and discuss proposed sentences -- i.e., gaps to be filled with Coogan (or JSB)
Questions about these steps?
- Finish your Talk page and Sandbox edits -- show your Team your references, your proposed sentences, and in which article(s) the sentences could be added.
- Step 5: Start talking! [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:ProfGray/ExerciseIntroEdit#Step_5:_Introduce_your_ideas_and_role_on_Article_Talk_page.28s.29:_Week_3_by_Wednesday.2C_Feb._11 see the assignment]
- Step 6: Best if teams do a quick peer review. Is the paraphrase too close? Is the reference fine? Does it belong in the article?
- Team coordination this week -- peer review
- Team coordination for next week -- divide up the Wife-sister academic articles
Wednesday
[edit]Objectives for today:
- Quickly review the BRE from Monday. Done
- Make progress on the Intro Edits exercise (for weeks 2-3). Let's make sure everyone can post in their Sandbox. For students who are almost finished and ready to edit an article -- let's aim to peer review these. Done
- Set up the Wife-Sister assignment. Go over the instructions. Circulate the articles. Time for team planning. Done
- Discuss your comparisons of the Wife-Sister narratives. Done
If there's time, we will review Coogan.
Handouts
- Hand back the BREs
- 2 Intro Edits exercise -- we will do this on laptops
-
- 3 For Wife-sister assignment, handout the WP article and assignment (if printer working) and scholarly articles
-
- 4. Wife-sister narratives
- Questions about the Biblical texts
- if time ==> read chapter 20:1-18, easier to act out, or 12:10-17 together. JSB on 20 is source critical, literary and intertextual
- Discuss student comparisons
Readings and tasks for today were:
- (Your work on the Intro Edits assignment)
- Wife-sister narratives: Genesis ch. 12, ch. 20, and 26:1-11 (wife-sister)
- Wikipedia (WP): Wife–sister narratives in the Book of Genesis
- Familiarize yourself with related WP sections for Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, Abimelech
- Make a comparative table (etc.) of the 3 narratives