User:Petri Krohn/moderated
A moderated nuclear explosion[1] results from a nuclear chain reaction mediated by moderated neutrons. Unlike most nuclear weapons, that rely on fast neutrons to sustain the chain reaction, a moderated nuclear explosion is sustained by moderated or slow neutrons.[citation needed] A moderated explosion may be the result of severe criticality accident or reactor accident, the most notable example being the Chernobyl disaster. Moderated nuclear explosions have also been tested in nuclear weapons.
With moderated neutrons fissile cross-sections are much higher than with fast neutrons, hence also the critical mass is much smaller. In the presence of a neutron moderator less fissile material is required to cause an uncontrolled chain reaction than that needed for a traditional nuclear explosive. Less than 1 kg of plutonium or enriched uranium dispersed in a water moderator may form a critical mass.[2][3] Under the right circumstances such a critical assembly may explode in a moderated nuclear explosion.[4][5]
It has been speculated that some of the explosions that destroyed the Fukushima I nuclear reactors were in fact moderated nuclear explosions.[6][7][8][9][10]
Nuclear weapon design
[edit]Early speculation about nuclear weapons assumed that an "atom bomb" would be a large amount of fissile material, moderated by a neutron moderator, similar in structure to a nuclear reactor or "pile".[11] Only the Manhattan project embraced the idea of a chain reaction of fast neutrons in pure metallic uranium or plutonium. Moderated designs were also considered by the Americans; proposals included using uranium hydride as the fissile material.[12][13] In 1943 Robert Oppenheimer and Niels Bohr considered the possibility of using a "pile" as a weapon.[14] The motivation was that with a graphite moderator it would be possible to achieve the chain reaction without the use of any isotope separation. In August 1945, when information of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was relayed to the scientist of the German nuclear program, interned at Farm Hall in England, chief scientist Werner Heisenberg hypothesized that the device must have been "something like a nuclear reactor, with the neutrons slowed by many collisions with a moderator."[15]
After the success of the Manhattan project, all major nuclear weapons programs have relied on fast neutrons in their weapons designs. The notable exception is the Ruth and Ray test explosions of Operation Upshot-Knothole. The aim of the University of California Radiation Laboratory design was to produce an explosion powerful enough to ignite a thermonuclear weapon, with the minimal amount of fissile material. The core consisted of uranium hydride, with hydrogen, or in the case of Ray, deuterium acting as the neutron moderator. The predicted yield was 1.5 to 3 kt for Ruth and 0.5-1 kt for Ray. The tests produced yield a 200 tons of TNT, both tests were considered to be fizzles.[12][13]
The main benefit of using a moderator in a nuclear explosive is that the amount of fissile material needed to reach criticality may be greatly reduced. Slowing of fast neutrons will increase the cross section for neutron absorption, reducing the critical mass. A side effect is however that as the chain reaction progresses, the moderator will be heated, thus loosing its ability to cool the neutrons.
Another effect of moderation is that the time between subsequent neutron generations is increased, slowing down the reaction. This makes the containment of the explosion a problem; the inertia that is used to confine implosion type bombs will not be able to confine the reaction. The end result may be a fizzle instead of a bang. In other words, not an explosion.
The explosive power of a fully moderated explosion is thus limited, at worst it may be equal to a chemical explosive of similar mass. A criticality accident would typically by terminated by explosive dispersion of the material after the yield has reached about a kilogram of high explosive equivalent.[5]
Again quoting Heisenberg:
- One can never make an explosive with slow neutrons, not even with the heavy water machine, as then the neutrons only go with thermal speed, with the result that the reaction is so slow that the thing explodes sooner, before the reaction is complete.
While a nuclear bomb working on thermal neutrons may be impractical, modern weapons designs may still benefit from some level of moderation. A beryllium tamper used as a neutron reflector will also act as a moderator.[16][17] [Note: citing a blog here]
Nuclear reactors
[edit]Nuclear reactors are controlled by keeping the criticality of the reactor in the narrow range between delayed criticality and prompt criticality. About 1% of neutrons in a reactor are delayed neutrons, that are emitted seconds after fission. The central principle of nuclear safety of nuclear reactors is that the reactor should never reach prompt criticality. Usually this is achieved by passive safety features, such as a negative void coefficient.
Prompt criticality of a nuclear reactor will result in a uncontrolled power excursion. At best it will result in steam explosion, where the coolant or moderator is ejected from the reactor; at worst it result in a meltdown and destruction of the reactor core and ejection of fissile material.
In the Chernobyl disaster the RBMK-1000 type reactor of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant reached prompt supercriticality.[18][19] This was partly due to the "xenon poisoning" of the reactor. Shutdown of the reactor and the low power level before the accident caused the buildup of xenon 135, a decay product of iodine 135 and a strong nuclear poison. The poisoning of the reactor forced the operators to completely pull out the control rods to start the reactor. A power surge burnt up the remaining xenon 135, driving the reactor to a high state of supercriticality.[20] The result was an explosive[4] disassembly of the reactor, and the spread of radioactive contamination throughout Europe.
References
[edit]- ^ V. F. Kolesov (February 2000). "Positive reactivity effect in hollow critical assemblies with moderated neutrons". Atomic Energy. 88 (5): 337–344. doi:10.1007/BF02680526. Retrieved 2007-09-19.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Minimum Critical Values Study - July 2005 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- ^ NRC CONSIDERS CHANGES TO REGULATIONS FOR SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL LICENSEES - July 28, 1999
- ^ a b Pakhomov, Sergey A.; Dubasov, Yuri V. (16 December 2009). "Estimation of Explosion Energy Yield at Chernobyl NPP Accident". Pure and Applied Geophysics. 167 (4–5). Springerlink.com: 575. doi:10.1007/s00024-009-0029-9.
- ^ a b C. D. Bowman and F. Venneri (March 1995). Underground Autocatalytic Criticality from Plutonium and Other Fissile Material (PDF). Los Alamos National Laboratory. p. 5. LA-UR-94-4022A.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Joseph Trento (14 March 2011). "Fission Criticality In Cooling Ponds Threaten Explosion At Fukushima". DC Bureau. Retrieved 2011-04-28.
- ^ Tom Clarke (16 March 2011). "Fukushima: the danger of going critical". Channel 4 News. Retrieved 2011-04-28.
- ^ "Busby: 'Can't seal Fukushima like Chernobyl - it all goes into sea'". Russia Today. 25.04.2011.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) (“I don’t think the end of Fukushima accident is in sight”) - ^ Arnold Gundersen (April 26, 2011). "Gundersen Postulates Unit 3 Explosion May Have Been Prompt Criticality in Fuel Pool". Fairewinds Associate. Retrieved 2011-04-28.
- ^ Dominique Leglu (April 28, 2011). "FUKUSHIMA (suite 34) De l'uranium de Fukushima en Californie ?". Sciences et Avenir. Retrieved 2011-04-28.
- ^ Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions - 8.2.1 Early Research on Fusion Weapons
- ^ a b Operation Upshot-Knothole
- ^ a b W48 - globalsecurity.org
- ^ Atomic Bomb Chronology: 1942-1944
- ^ Hans Bethe in Physics Today Vol 53 (2001) [1]
- ^ Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions - 4.1.7.3.2 Reflectors
- ^ N Moderation
- ^ "How does a nuclear reactor work?". Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
- ^ Leonard Berkowitz, Norma Berkowitz, and Michael Patrick (2006). Chernobyl: the Evant and its Aftetmath (PDF). Friends of Chernobyl Center. p. 32.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Xenon Poisoning" or Neutron Absorption in Reactors