You're very welcome to leave a message on my talk page to let me know if I need to fix anything, if you have any questions about an edit I've done, or if you think I can help you with something (if I can't I'll try and point you towards someone/something that can) that's probably the place to ask.
You can view my voting rationale here. Link for self-use: [[User:Petros471/RfA criteria|my RfA criteria]]
Considering becoming an admin? Feel free to ask me if I think you'd be suitable. When I think you'd be ready (I might provide some suggestions before that) I'd be happy to nominate you. (RFA reviews subpage)
As Femto says: "Male, European, and already paranoid about giving away this much information." Well I'm a bit less paranoid than he is, so I can tell you I'm male, British, and have an age of somewhere between 10 and 100. Also if you're really interested I've released rather more than that out to the big world wide web.
Contact!
The best way to contact me is usually by leaving a new message on my talk page. There's nothing like a big orange bar to get my attention, and messages there will probably get the fastest response. You can also email me. I will try to reply as soon as possible (I reserve the right to not reply to personal attacks or other emails of that nature). However expect my response to be slower than messages to my talk page, and preferably leave email to messages that have a good reason to be private (or when you can't edit my talk page because of a block). Please include your Wikipedia username so I know who you are. Thanks.
Important: If you are emailing me about a block, make sure you include your username (if applicable), IP address and the block reason.
I award this barnstar for diffusing a situation with an editor (me) in a rage, and making it work Benjaminstewart05 08:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I, EWS23, hereby award Petros471 this Original Barnstar for offering to do the difficult job of helping myself and others with Requests for Adminship. Keep up the good work! 04:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)➨ ЯEDVERS awards this Barnstar to Petros471 for tidying up WP:AIV to make it usable for both admins and reporters. Thanks!I award you with this PSI for assisting me with my various scenarios on wikipedia.--Andeh 18:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Since anyone can edit almost any Wikipedia article, it is possible for biased, out of date, or incorrect information to be added to Wikipedia. To improve Wikipedia's reliability, fix these problems by doing the following:
As often as you can, monitor and check changes made to articles. Your Watchlist, and the Related changes and Recent changes features are useful for this.
For dubious statements that are not sourced or are likely to be challenged, hunt for references that are reliable, relevant, accurate, objective, and timely. Add citations for these to the article.
Read the references provided by articles and check them for reliability, relevance, accuracy, objectivity, and timeliness. That is, read the source material cited, and remove irrelevant or unreliable citations.
