User:Panggih

Panggih

Just a guy who loves Books and Encyclopedias ,who appreciates the paradoxical playground of Wikipedia , with it's delightfully anarchic tone where we can paint the world as we would like it to be but with it's boundaries and limits and systems of checks-and-balances to keep the objective neutral point of view reportations and/or representations of the truth. But in a sense,finding the truth itself elusive and fraught with ambiguities,in the end,waxing semantically,what is truth anyway ?,how can we know which is true and which isn't ?,which is neutral and which is polarized ?,what is objective if not the subjective peer-reviewed and consensused,but then again in the end,only the truth matters ,because of that myriad reasons,some which i cannot state without making an offense in one of a few political battlefields here in the project, i choose instead to try to joyfully co-exist and participate in the sorrow ,suffering and hardships of the Free Wikipedia project (Freedom with restriction that is,the phrase which,i arguably conclude,an oxymoron in it itself),by writing this tirade ,you may think i'm a Buddhist (this is a joke by the way,it doesn't matter what my religious/spiritual affiliation is,it's somewhat of an intro to a theme i'm going to elaborate below),well maybe i am ,but then again maybe i am not,maybe people will try to label me and accuse me of being political by announcing my unwillingness to play the battlefield,i don't know,i can only observe and my opinions of that are my own..but usually people would be harsh to label and have a priori thoughts and prejudices..And I will say this,not trying to be political or otherwise , but let truth do the rain-dance-revolution supreme..that's a crappy statement,but it's me..i deserve this,i'd put an exclamation point in this,but i don't want to be read as making a statement..i'll be Meta instead..

I am currently Working on MY OWN ARTICLE on Prof. Seyyed Hossein Nasr and expanding/improving on the current one,i found it unsatisfactorily vague and full of POV statements,the original person who wrote it can debate me on it , currently researching as i am not pleased at being point at as a copy-and-paster and trying to be original,thank you very much..