User:Ooneil/Women in government
On this sandbox page, I'll have my edits for the Wiki page Women in government.
[Intro] Women may face a number of challenges that affect their ability to participate in political life and become political leaders. Several countries are exploring measures that may increase women's participation in government at all levels, from local to national.[1][2] More and more women are pursuing leadership positions in the present day, and trends imply that an increase in women candidates for government will continue to increase.[3]
Challenges faced by women in government
[edit]Women face numerous obstacles in achieving representation in governance. Party leaders are predominantly men, and those male leaders tend to choose male candidates - ones that are similar to themselves - rather than female candidates.[4] Recruitment works through networks such as lower level office holders or affiliated businesses. Since women are underrepresented in these networks, according to statistics, they are less likely to be recruited than men. Due to these challenges, women have to spend time and conscious effort building a financial support system, unlike men.[5]
Financing campaigns
[edit]According to a survey conducted on a sample of 3,640 elected municipal officeholders, women face adversities such as financing a campaign because they are not as heavily recruited as men by party leaders.[6] Women's pursuit to be elected into government positions comes with challenges such as the financing of their campaigns. Candidates for government positions tend to spend the same amounts throughout their campaigns regardless of gender[7], but women are aided by laws in place to restrict donation sizes and spending amounts.[8] Without limitations like these in place, male candidates, who have more resources on average than female candidates, would be able to outraise and outspend.[9] Campaign donations come primarily from men and, even when men donate to both men and women candidates, they donate more to men than to women[10]. While women are capable of matching their male opponents in fundraising totals, studies show that they have to work harder in order to achieve the same result because men tend to receive more ready support from party leaders.[11]
Society
[edit]Gender inequality within families, inequitable division of labor within households, and cultural attitudes about gender roles further subjugate women and serve to limit their representation in public life.[6] Societies that are highly patriarchal often have unwavering power structures that are difficult for women to combat.[12] Thus, their interests are often not represented or under-represented.
Systematic challenges
[edit]There have been many arguments saying the plurality-majority voting system is a disadvantage to the chance that women get into office. Andrew Reynolds brings forth one of these arguments by stating: "Plurality-majority single-member-district systems, whether of the Anglo-American first-past-the-post (FPTP) variety, the Australian preference ballot alternative vote (AV), or the French two-round system (TRS), are deemed to be particularly unfavorable to women's chances of being elected to office".[13] Andrew believes that the best systems are list-proportional systems. "In these systems of high proportionality between seats won and votes cast, small parties are able to gain representation and parties have an incentive to broaden their overall electoral appeal by making their candidate lists as diverse as possible".[13]
Even once elected, women tend to hold lesser valued cabinet ministries or similar positions.[14] These are sometimes described as "soft industries" and include health, education, and welfare. Far less often do women hold executive decision-making authority in more powerful domains or those that are associated with traditional notions of masculinity (such as finance and the military). Typically, the more powerful the institution, the less likely it is that women's interests will be represented. Additionally, in more autocratic nations, women are less likely to have their interests represented.[12]Many women attain political standing due to kinship ties, as they have male family members who are involved in politics.[14] These women tend to be from higher income, higher status families and thus may not be as focused on the issues faced by lower income families. In The United States, the lower end of the professional ladder contains a higher proportion of women while the upper level contains a higher proportion of men. Research shows that women are underrepresented in head positions in state agencies making up only 18% of congress and 15% of corporate board positions. When women do gain any level of representation it is in the fields of health, welfare, and labor. They are seen to be addressing issues labeled as feminine.[15] More women than ever are running for Congress and state legislative positions in the United States[16], but those who lack major endorsements, are running against an incumbent, are Republican candidates, or are running in a conservative district/state are less likely to win than their male opponents[17].
Personal life and choices
[edit]Additionally, women running for public office typically gain additional, unnecessary scrutiny on their private lives. For instance, fashion choices of politically active women are often picked apart by the media. In these "analyses" women rarely gain approval from those in the media, who usually say they either they show too much skin or too little, or perhaps that they either look too feminine or too masculine. Sylvia Bashevkin also notes that their romantic lives are often subject of much interest to the general population, perhaps more so than their political agenda or stances on issues.[18] She points out that those who "appear to be sexually active outside a monogamous heterosexual marriage run into particular difficulties, since they tend to be portrayed as vexatious vixens"[19] who are more interested in their private romantic lives than in their public responsibilities.[18] If they are in a monogamous, married relationship but have children, then their fitness for office becomes a question of how they manage being a politician while taking care of their children, something that a male politician would rarely, if ever, be asked about.
Family duties and family forming cause significant delays in aspiring women's political careers.[20]
A 2017 study found that female Republican candidates fare worse in elections than Republican men and Democratic women.[21]
A 2020 study found that being promoted to the position of mayor or parliamentarian doubles the probability of divorce for women, but not for men.[22]
Political parties
[edit]In Canada, there is evidence that female politicians face gender stigma from male members of the political parties to which they belong which can undermine the ability of women to reach or maintain leadership roles. Pauline Marois, leader of the Parti Québécois (PQ) and the official opposition of the National Assembly of Quebec, was the subject of a claim by Claude Pinard, a PQ "backbencher", that many Quebecers do not support a female politician: "I believe that one of her serious handicaps is the fact she's a woman [...] I sincerely believe that a good segment of the population won't support her because she's a woman".[23] A 2000 study that analyzed 1993 election results in Canada found that among "similarly situated women and men candidates", women actually had a small vote advantage. The study showed that neither voter turnout nor urban/rural constituencies were factors that help or hurt a female candidate, but "office-holding experience in non-political organizations made a modest contribution to women's electoral advantage".[24]
Bruce M. Hicks, an electoral studies researcher at Université de Montréal, states that evidence shows that female candidates begin with a head start in voters' eyes of as much as 10 per cent, and that female candidates are often more favorably associated by voters with issues like health care and education.[23] The electorate's perception that female candidates have more proficiency with traditional women's spheres such as education and health care presents a possibility that gender stereotypes can work in a female candidate's favor, at least among the electorate. In politics, however, Hicks points out that sexism is nothing new:
(Marois' issue) does reflect what has been going on for some time now: women in positions of authority have problems in terms of the way they manage authority [...] The problem isn't them, it's the men under them who resent taking direction from strong women. And the backroom dirty dialogue can come into the public eye.[23]
Within Quebec itself, Don McPherson pointed out that Pinard himself has enjoyed greater electoral success with Pauline Marois as party leader than under a previous male party leader, when Pinard failed to be elected in his riding. Demographically, Pinard's electoral riding is rural, with "relatively older, less-well educated voters".[25]
[Section currently titled "Mirror representation"]
Mirror representation
[edit]Women's participation in formal politics is lower than men's throughout the world.[26] The argument put forth by scholars Jacquetta Newman and Linda White is that women's participation in the realm of high politics is crucial if the goal is to affect the quality of public policy. As such, the concept of mirror representation aims to achieve gender parity in public office. In other words, mirror representation says that the proportion of women in leadership should match the proportion of women in the population that they govern. Mirror representation is premised on the assumption that elected officials of a particular gender would likely support policies that seek to benefit constituents of the same gender.
Effects on public policy
[edit]A key critique is that mirror representation assumes that all members of a particular sex operate under the rubric of a shared identity, without taking into consideration other factors such as age, education, culture, or socioeconomic status.[27]However, proponents of mirror representation argue that women have a different relationship with government institutions and public policy than that of men, and therefore merit equal representation on this facet alone. This feature is based on the historical reality that women, regardless of background, have largely been excluded from influential legislative and leadership positions. As Sylvia Bashevkin notes, "representative democracy seems impaired, partial, and unjust when women, as a majority of citizens, fail to see themselves reflected in the leadership of their polity."[28] In fact, the issue of participation of women in politics is of such importance that the United Nations has identified gender equality in representation (i.e. mirror representation) as a goal in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Beijing Platform for Action.[29] Besides seeking equality, the goal of mirror representation is also to recognize the significance of women's involvement in politics, which subsequently legitimizes said involvement.
There have been differing results between studies that looked at the significance of women's representation on actual policy outcomes. Though women in the United States are more likely to identify as feminists,[30] a 2014 study looking at the United States finds "no effect of gender of the mayor on policy outcomes."[31] A 2012 study finds mixed evidence that the share of female councilors in Sweden affected conditions for women citizens, such as women's income, unemployment, health, and parental leave.[32] A 2015 study in Sweden said that: "The findings show that female legislators defend feminist interests more than their male colleagues but that they only marginally respond to women's electoral preferences."[33] A 2016 study looking at African politicians finds "gender differences in policy priorities [to be] quite small on average, vary across policy domains and countries".[34]
![Moroccan born female elected head of the Dutch Parliament](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/Khadija_Arib_2015.jpg/180px-Khadija_Arib_2015.jpg)
Social and cultural barriers
[edit]Mirror representation stems from the barriers female political candidates often face, these include:sex stereotyping,political socialization, lack of preparation for political activity, and balancing work and family. In the media, women are often asked how they would balance the responsibilities of elected office with those to their families, something men are never asked.[35]
Sex stereotyping: Sex stereotyping assumes that masculine and feminine traits are intertwined with leadership. Hence, the bias leveled against women stems from the perception that femininity inherently produces weak leadership.[36] Due to the aggressive and competitive nature of politics, many insist that participation in elected office requires masculine traits.[37] Sex stereotyping is far from being a historical narrative. The pressure is on female candidates (and not male ones) to enhance their masculine traits in order to garner support from voters who identify with socially constructed gender roles. Apart from this, studies by American University in 2011 reveal that women are 60% less likely than men to believe that they are not qualified to take politics responsibility.[38] So, the patriarchy in politics is responsible for less participation of women.
Sexual and Physical Violence: In Kenya, a woman's rights activist named Asha Ali was threatened and beaten by three men for standing as a candidate in front of her kids and elderly mother.[39] A 2010 survey of eight hundred likely U.S voters found that even very mild sexist language had an impact on their likelihood of voting for a woman (Krook, 2017).[39] Even in early 2016, a 14-year-old girl was kidnapped from her bed late at night and raped as revenge for her mother's victory in local elections in India, which is an example of sexual violence.[39] All of this evidence suggests that women face many challenges in a political environment where men try to suppress women whenever they try to raise their voices in politics for making positive change for women's empowerment.
Lack of support from media: The qualitative and quantitative study reveals that media reflects and strengthens a male-overwhelmed society.[40] Women in the news is usually for bad news and just for all the vulgar or wrong reasons such as about their looks, personal life and their clothes and characters.[40] Media likes to give more updates about all these above examples instead of their actual politics role and achievements[41]
Political socialization: Political socialization is the idea that, during childhood, people are indoctrinated into socially constructed norms of politics. In the case of women's representation in government, it says that sex stereotyping begins at an early age and affects the public's disposition on which genders are fit for public office. Socialization agents can include family, school, higher education, mass media, and religion.[42] Each of these agents plays a pivotal role in either fostering a desire to enter politics, or dissuading one to do so.
Generally, girls tend to see politics as a "male domain"[43]. Newman and White suggest that women who run for political office have been "socialized toward an interest in and life in politics" and that "many female politicians report being born into political families with weak gender-role norms."[44]
Women running for U.S senate are often underrepresented in news coverage. The way male and female candidates are depicted in media has an effect on how female candidates gets elected in to public office. Female candidates get treated differently in the media than their male counterparts in the U.S senate elections. Women receive less news coverage and the coverage they do receive concentrates more on their viability and less on their issue positions, which causes female candidates to be overlooked and underrated during elections, which is an obstacle for women running for U.S senate.[45]
Lack of preparation for political activity: An aftereffect of political socialization is that it determines how inclined women are to pursue careers that may be compatible with formal politics. Careers in law, business, education, and government, professions in which women happen to be minorities, are common occupations for those that later decide to enter public office.[44] Women are less likely than men to have exposure working for and with politicians prior to running for office because they are offered fewer internship roles than men. A Princeton University committee dedicated to research on the involvement of women in political roles during their political science and government studies found that this is due to a perception that women do not belong in leadership positions.[46] In all fields, women receive less paid internships and internships overall versus their male counterparts. Internships are shown to increase likelihood of securing a desired job.[47]
Balancing work and family: The work life balance is invariably more difficult for women, because they are generally expected by society to act as the primary caregivers for children and maintainers of the home. Due to these demands, it is assumed that women would choose to delay political aspirations until their children are older. Also, a woman's desire for a career in politics along with the extent that the respondent feels her family duties might inhibit her ability to be an elected official.[48] Research has shown that new female politicians in Canada and the U.S. are older than their male counterparts.[49] Conversely, a woman may be pushed to remain childless in order to seek political office.
Institutional barriers may also pose as a hindrance for balancing a political career and family. For instance, in Canada, Members of Parliament do not contribute to Employment Insurance; therefore, they are not entitled to paternity benefits.[50] Such lack of parental leave would undoubtedly be a reason for women to delay seeking electoral office. Furthermore, mobility plays a crucial role in the work-family dynamic. Elected officials are usually required to commute long distances to and from their respective capital cities, which can be a deterrent for women seeking political office.
[Section currently titled "Pathways to political involvement"]
Pathways to political involvement
[edit]Globally, there have been four general pathways that have led women into political office:[51]
- Political family – women in this path come from families that have a long history of involvement in electoral politics.
- Surrogate – women in this path have assumed office, often temporarily, as a surrogate for a father, husband, or brother who has recently died.
- Party or political insider – women in this path start at the bottom of a party or political ladder and work their way up over time filling in necessary roles to show loyalty to the party.
- Political outsider – women in this path usually lack political experience but they run on a platform emphasizing new political changes and serve as an alternative to the status quo.
[Section currently titled "Policies to increase women's participation"]
Policies to increase women's participation in government
[edit]The United Nations has identified six avenues by which female participation in politics and government may be strengthened. These avenues are: equalization of educational opportunities, quotas for female participation in governing bodies, legislative reform to increase focus on issues concerning women and children, financing gender-responsive budgets to equally take into account the needs of men and women, increasing the presence of sex-disaggregated statistics in national research/data, and furthering the presence and agency of grassroots women's empowerment movements.[6]
The first government organization formed with the goal of women's equality was the Zhenotdel, in Soviet Russia in the 1920s.
Education
[edit]Women with formal education (at any level) are more likely to delay marriage and subsequent childbirth, be better informed about infant and child nutrition, and ensure childhood immunization. Children of mothers with formal education are better nourished and have higher survival rates.[6] Education is a vital tool for any person in society to better themselves in their career path, and equalization of educational opportunities for boys and girls may take the form of several initiatives:
- abolishment of educational fees which would require parents to consider financial issues when deciding which of their children to educate. Poor children in rural areas are particularly affected by inequality resulting from educational fees.[52]
- encouragement of parents and communities to institute gender-equal educational agendas. Perceived opportunity cost of educating girls may be addressed through a conditional cash transfer program which financially reward families who educate their daughters (thus removing the financial barrier that results from girls substituting school attendance for work in the family labor force).[53]
- creation of "girl-friendly" schools to minimize bias and create a safe school environment for girls and young women. Currently, a barrier to female school attendance is the risk of sexual violence en route to school.[54] A "safe school environment" is one in which the school is located to minimize such violence, in addition to providing girls with educational opportunities (as opposed to using female students to perform janitorial work or other menial labor).[54]
Mark P. Jones, in reference to Norris's Legislative Recruitment, states that: "Unlike other factors that have been identified as influencing the level of women's legislative representation, such as a country's political culture and level of economic development, institutional rules are relatively easy to change".[55]
In an article about the exclusion of Women from politics in southern Africa, Amanda Gouws said "The biggest hurdles to overcome for women are still on the local level where both men and women are often recruited from the communities and have limited political skills".[56] The level of education in these local governments or, for that matter, the people in those positions of power, are substandard.
One example of the hurdles women face in receiving good education comes from Beijing. "Most women who attended the NGO Forums accompanying the UN conferences, which are for government delegations (though increasingly many governments include activists and NGO members among their official delegates), were middle-class educated women from INGOS, donors, academics, and activists".[57] Lydia Kompe, a well-known South African activist, was one of these rural women. She noted that she felt overwhelmed and completely disempowered. In the beginning, she did not think she could finish her term of office because of her lack of education.[56] Manisha Desai explains that: "There is an inequality simply around the fact that the UN system and its locations say a lot about the current focus of those systems, such positions being in the US and Western Europe allow easier access to those women in the area.[57] It is also important to note that institutions affect the cultural propensity to elect women candidates in different ways in different parts of the world."[58]
The study of the history of women's representation has been a major contribution in helping scholars view such concepts. Andrew Reynolds states: "historical experience often leads to gender advancement, and political liberalization enables women to mobilize within the public sphere".[58] He argues that we will see a larger number of women in higher office positions in established democracy than in democracies that are developing, and "the more illiberal a state is, the fewer women will be in positions of power".[58] As countries open education systems to women, and more women participate in historically male dominated fields, it is possible to see a shift in political views regarding women in government.
[Section currently titled "Historic firsts as heads of state or government"]
Historic firsts as heads of state or government
[edit]The socialist revolutions taking place during World War I saw the first few women became members of governments. Alexandra Kollontai became the first female to hold a minister position, as the People's Commissar for Social Welfare in Soviet Russia in October 1917.[59] Yevgenia Bosch held the position of Minister of Interior and Acting Leader of the People's Secretariat of Ukraine, one of a number of competing ruling bodies in the Ukrainian People's Republic, the predecessor of Soviet Ukraine (it proclaimed its independence from the Russian Soviet Republic on 25 January 1918). She is sometimes considered the first modern woman leader of a national government.[60]
The first women, other than female hereditary rulers, to hold head of state positions were in socialist countries. Khertek Anchimaa-Toka led the Tuvan People's Republic, a little recognized state that is today part of Russia, from 1940–1944. Sükhbaataryn Yanjmaa was acting leader of the Mongolian People's Republic 1953–1954 and Soong Ching-ling was acting co-chair of the People's Republic of China from 1968–1972 and again in 1981.
The first democratically elected female prime minister (head of government) of a sovereign country was Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1960–1965. She served again 1970–77 and 1994–2000; a total of 17 years. Other early elected female prime ministers were Indira Gandhi of India (1966–1977; she served again 1980–1984), Golda Meir of Israel (1969–1974) and Margaret Thatcher of the United Kingdom (1979–1990). Eugenia Charles of the Dominican Republic is the longest (continuously) serving female prime minister (1980–1995).[61]
The first woman to hold the title of "president", as opposed to a queen or prime minister, was Isabel Perón of Argentina (appointed head of state and government, 1974–76). The world's first elected female president was Vigdís Finnbogadóttirof Iceland, whose term lasted from 1980 to 1996. She is the longest-serving elected female head of state of any country to date. Corazon Aquino, President of the Philippines (1986–1992), was the first woman president in Southeast Asia.
Benazir Bhutto, prime minister of Pakistan (1988–1990), was the first female prime minister of a muslim majority country. She served again 1993–96. The second was Khaleda Zia (1991–1996) of Bangladesh. Tansu Çiller of Turkey was the first elected muslim female prime minister in Europe (1993–1996).
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2d/Presidente_da_Coreia_do_Sul%2C_Park_Geun-hye%2C_visita_o_Brasil.jpg/250px-Presidente_da_Coreia_do_Sul%2C_Park_Geun-hye%2C_visita_o_Brasil.jpg)
Elisabeth Domitien was appointed prime minister of the Central African Republic (1975–1976). Carmen Pereira of Guinea-Bissau (1984) and Sylvie Kinigi of Burundi (1993) acted as head of state for 2 days and 101 days respectively. Ruth Perry, Liberia was the first appointed female head of state in Africa (1996–1997). Ten years later, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia was Africa's first elected female head of state (2006–2018).
Sri Lanka was the first nation to possess a female president, Chandrika Kumaratunga (1994–2000), and a female prime minister (Sirimavo Bandaranaike) simultaneously. This also marked the first time that a female prime minister (Sirimavo Bandaranaike) directly succeeded another female prime minister (Chandrika Kumaratunga). Mary McAleese's election as president of Ireland (1997–2011) was the first time that a female president directly succeeded another female president, Mary Robinson. Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, prime minister of Iceland (2009–2013), was the world's first openly lesbian world leader, first female world leader to wed a same-sex partner while in office.
In 2015, Elizabeth II became the longest-reigning queen regnant and female head of state in world history. In 2016, she became the longest currently serving head of state and longest currently reigning monarch.
The first woman to be appointed President of the European Commission was Ursula von der Leyen in 2019.
In November 2020, Kamala Harris, under President-Elect Joe Biden, became the first woman to become Vice President-elect of the United States and will take office in January 2021 until January 2025. She will also be the first biracial, first black, and first Asian Vice President of the United States.[62]
- ^ "What we do: Leadership and political participation". UN Women. Retrieved 2020-12-02.
- ^ Representation2020.com. "Women Running". RepresentWomen. Retrieved 2020-12-02.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation". UN Women. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
- ^ Butler, Daniel M.; Preece, Jessica Robinson (2016-09-15). "Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support". Political Research Quarterly. 69 (4): 842–851. doi:10.1177/1065912916668412. S2CID 157460168.
- ^ Butler, Daniel M.; Preece, Jessica Robinson (2016). "SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research". Political Research Quarterly. 69 (4): 842–851. doi:10.1177/1065912916668412. S2CID 157460168.
- ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference
unicef.org
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Hogan, Robert E. (2007). "The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections". Social Science Quarterly. 88 (5): 1092–1105. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00493.x. ISSN 0038-4941. JSTOR 42956234.
- ^ Cigane, Lolita; Ohman, Magnus. "Political Finance and Gender Equality" (PDF). International Foundation for Electoral Systems.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Thane, Sara (2014-01-01). "Comparing the Campaign Financing Patterns of Male and Female Congressional Candidates". Undergraduate Theses, Professional Papers, and Capstone Artifacts.
- ^ Zernike, Kate (2018-10-30). "Female Candidates Break Barriers, Except When It Comes to Money (Published 2018)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
- ^ Dittmar, Kelly (2018-09-21). "The hardest part of being a woman in Congress? Getting there". Gender Watch 2018. Retrieved 2018-12-06.
- ^ a b UNRISD (2006), "Overview", in UNRISD (ed.), Gender equality: striving for justice in an unequal world, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, p. xxi, ISBN 9789290850731
- ^ a b Reynolds, Andrew (July 1999). "Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: knocking at the highest glass ceiling". World Politics. 51 (4): 547–572. doi:10.1017/S0043887100009254. S2CID 153495080.
- ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
Basu, Amriyta 2003
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Smith, Amy E.; Monaghan, Karen R. (2013-01-01). "Some Ceilings Have More Cracks: Representative Bureaucracy in Federal Regulatory Agencies". The American Review of Public Administration. 43 (1): 50–71. doi:10.1177/0275074011420997. ISSN 0275-0740. S2CID 154428935.
- ^ "New Records for Women Candidates as 2020 Election Filings Close" (PDF). Rutgers Eagleton Institute of Politics.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Conroy, Meredith (2020-09-02). "More Women Than Ever Are Running For Office. But Are They Winning Their Primaries?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 2020-11-13.
- ^ a b Bashevkin, Sylvia (2009), "Vexatious Vixens", in Bashevkin, Sylvia (ed.), Women, Power, Politics: The Hidden Story of Canada's Unfinished Democracy, Oxford University Press, pp. 86–89, ISBN 9780195431704.
- ^ Bashevkin, Sylvia (2009), "Vexatious Vixens", in Bashevkin, Sylvia (ed.), Women, Power, Politics: The Hidden Story of Canada's Unfinished Democracy, Oxford University Press, p. 88, ISBN 9780195431704.
- ^ Jalaza, Farida (2016-04-15). "Introduction". Shattered, Cracked, or Family Intact?: Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. Oxford University Press. p. 17. ISBN 9780190602093.
- ^ Bucchianeri, Peter (2018). "Is Running Enough? Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom about Women Candidates". Political Behavior. 40 (2): 435–466. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9407-7. ISSN 0190-9320. S2CID 148761998.
- ^ Folke, Olle; Rickne, Johanna (2020). "All the Single Ladies: Job Promotions and the Durability of Marriage". American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 12 (1): 260–287. doi:10.1257/app.20180435. ISSN 1945-7782. S2CID 35429913.
- ^ a b c Banerjee, Sidhartha (November 2, 2011). "PQ woes prompt debate in Quebec about whether women get a fair deal in politics". The Canadian Press. Retrieved November 2, 2011.
- ^ Black, J.H.; Erickson, Lynda (March 2003). "Women candidates and voter bias: do women politicians need to be better?". Electoral Studies. 22 (1): 81–100. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00028-2.
- ^ McPherson, Don (November 3, 2011). "Pauline Marois's troubles aren't because of sexism". Montreal Gazette. Canada. Archived from the original on January 7, 2012. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- ^ Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (2012), "The women's movement in Canada", in Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (eds.), Women, politics, and public policy: the political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.), Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, p. 88, ISBN 9780195432497.
- ^ Pitkin, Hannah F. (1967), "Formalistic views of representation", in Pitkin, Hannah F. (ed.), The concept of representation, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, p. 61, ISBN 9780520021563.
- ^ Bashevkin, Sylvia (2009), "Introduction", in Bashevkin, Sylvia (ed.), Women, power, politics: the hidden story of Canada's unfinished democracy, Oxford University Press, p. 15, ISBN 9780195431704.
- ^ Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (2012), "The women's movement in Canada", in Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (eds.), Women, politics, and public policy: the political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.), Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, p. 89, ISBN 9780195432497.
- ^ Cai, Weiyi (January 27, 2016). "What Americans think about feminism today". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2016.
- ^ Ferreira, Fernando; Gyourko, Joseph (April 2014). "Does gender matter for political leadership? The case of U.S. mayors". Journal of Public Economics. 112: 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.006. S2CID 153460717.
- ^ Wängnerud, Lena; Sundell, Anders (March 2012). "Do politics matter? Women in Swedish local elected assemblies 1970–2010 and gender equality in outcomes". European Political Science Review. 4 (1): 97–120. doi:10.1017/S1755773911000087. S2CID 154549148.
- ^ Lloren, Anouk (2015). "Women's substantive representation: defending feminist interests or women's electoral preferences?". The Journal of Legislative Studies. 21 (2): 144–167. doi:10.1080/13572334.2014.966643. S2CID 85534263.
- ^ Gottlieb, Jessica; Grossman, Guy; Robinson, Amanda Lea (April 2016). "Do men and women have different policy preferences in Africa? Determinants and implications of gender gaps in policy prioritization". British Journal of Political Science. 48 (3): 611–636. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000053. S2CID 156194257. (Published online first.)
- ^ Beaudoux García, Virginia (January 18, 2017). "Five ways the media hurts female politicians — and how journalists everywhere can do better". The Conversation. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved January 26, 2017.
- ^ Kittilson, Miki C.; Fridkin, Kim (September 2008). "Gender, candidate portrayals and election campaigns: a comparative perspective". Politics and Gender. 4 (3): 373. doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330. S2CID 145574989.
- ^ MacIvor, Heather (1996), "Women's participation in politics", in MacIvor, Heather (ed.), Women and politics in Canada: an introductory text, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, p. 242, ISBN 9781551110363.
- ^ "Huffington Post", Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014, doi:10.4135/9781452244723.n260, ISBN 978-1-4522-4471-6
- ^ a b c Krook, Mona Lena (2017). "Violence Against Women in Politics". Journal of Democracy. 28 (1): 74–88. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0007. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 152103794.
- ^ a b Lachover, Einat (2016-06-23). "Signs of change in media representation of women in Israeli politics: Leading and peripheral women contenders". Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. 18 (4): 446–463. doi:10.1177/1464884915610991. ISSN 1464-8849. S2CID 147381109.
- ^ Zarkov, Dubravka (2017-01-25). "Women, feminism and politics". European Journal of Women's Studies. 24 (1): 3–6. doi:10.1177/1350506816681124. ISSN 1350-5068.
- ^ Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (2012), "Women's participation in formal politics", in Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (eds.), Women, politics, and public policy: the political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.), Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, p. 99, ISBN 9780195432497.
- ^ Gidengil, Elisabeth; O'Neill, Brenda; Young, Lisa (2010). "Her mother's daughter? The influence of childhood socialization on women's political engagement" (PDF). Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. 31 (4): 334. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2010.533590. S2CID 53409655.
- ^ a b Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (2012), "Women's participation in formal politics", in Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (eds.), Women, politics, and public policy: the political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.), Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, p. 101, ISBN 9780195432497.
- ^ Kahn, Kim Fridkin; Goldenberg, Edie N. (1991-01-01). "Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage". Public Opinion Quarterly. 55 (2): 180–199. doi:10.1086/269251. ISSN 0033-362X.
- ^ "Presidential committee makes recommendations to strengthen student leadership". Princeton University. Retrieved 2020-12-02.
- ^ Zilvinskis, John; Gillis, Jennifer; Smith, Kelli K. (2020-08-12). "Unpaid Versus Paid Internships: Group Membership Makes the Difference". Journal of College Student Development. 61 (4): 510–516. doi:10.1353/csd.2020.0042. ISSN 1543-3382. S2CID 226763370.
- ^ Elder, Laurel (21 September 2004). "Why Women Don't Run". Women & Politics. 26 (2): 27–56. doi:10.1300/J014v26n02_02. ISSN 0195-7732. S2CID 153570490.
- ^ Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (2012), "Women's participation in formal politics", in Newman, Jacquetta; White, Linda A. (eds.), Women, politics, and public policy: the political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.), Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, p. 102, ISBN 9780195432497.
- ^ Parliament of Canada. "40th Parliament, 3rd Session". October 18, 2010. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- ^ Henderson, Sarah L.; Jeydel, Alana S. (2014). "1. Women and International Politics". Women and Politics in a Global World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0199899661.
- ^ United Nations Children's Fund; World Bank. Building on what we know and defining sustained support (PDF). School Fee Abolition Initiative Workshop, organized by UNICEF and the World Bank, Nairobi, 5–7 April 2006, p. 3
- ^ Bellamy, Carol (2003). The state of the world's children, 2004: Girls' education And development. New York: UNICEF. ISBN 9780756740214. Pdf.
- ^ a b United Nations Children's Fund, The State of the World's Children 2004.
- ^ Jones, Mark P. (February 1998). "Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: lessons from the Argentine provinces". Comparative Political Studies. 31 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1177/0010414098031001001. S2CID 154644601.
- ^ a b Gouws, Amanda (2008). "Changing women's exclusion from politics: examples from Southern Africa". African and Asian Studies. 7 (4): 537–563. doi:10.1163/156921008X359650.
- ^ a b Desai, Manisha (June 2005). "Transnationalism: the face of feminist politics post-Beijing". International Social Science Journal. 57 (184): 319–330. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.553.x.
- ^ a b c Reynolds, Andrew (July 1999). "Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: knocking at the highest glass ceiling". World Politics. 51 (4): 547–572. doi:10.1017/S0043887100009254. S2CID 153495080.
- ^ "First female ministers". guide2womenleaders.com. Worldwide Guide to Women in Leadership.
- ^ Targino, Rafael (February 7, 2015). "Em 25 anos, dobra número de mulheres no comando de países em todo o mundo". Revista Fórum. (Portuguese). Retrieved September 14, 2018.
- ^ Third longest when considering non-consecutive terms, after Indira Gandhi of India and the Sri Lankan leader, Sirimavo Bandaranaike.
- ^ "Presidential Election Results: Biden Wins". The New York Times. 2020-11-03. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-13.