User:Odile Petit-Chat/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (BAnQ) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblioth%C3%A8que_et_Archives_nationales_du_Qu%C3%A9bec
- Nous avons choisi l'article par intérêt pour l'institution BAnQ, et parce que nous voyions le potentiel de le bonifier.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? : Oui!
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? : Oui!
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? : Non.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? : Concis!
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui
- Is the content up-to-date? : les dernières discussions datent de 2018, mais il y a des modifications plus récentes dans l'historique.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
L'article est assez neutre, je ne vois pas d'éléments qui pourraient influencer les lecteurs à prendre position sur quelque chose.
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
Les sources sont très diversifiées et de qualité pour la plupart : monographie, article de fonds, etc,. Les liens sont fonctionnels. Parmi les auteurs cités, pas mal d'archivistes tout de même.
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- L'article est très facile à lire et les sections sont bien divisées.
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
Il y a une photo de la Grande bibliothèque et d'autres des Archives nationales, ou encore une image du logo de la Bibliothèque nationale. Tout est en règle du côté des droits d'auteur: CC-BY-SA, domaine public, etc.
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- L'article est encore au statut d'ébauche. Il y a peu de discussion sur la page, et un débat d'édition a eu lieu en 2016, à savoir s'il fallait mentionner l'activité Mardi c'est Wiki. L'un des utilisateur mentionnait qu'il s'agissait d'une publicité pour BAnQ et a retiré l'article. La personne ayant ajouté l'information précédemment mentionnait toutefois que l'information n'était pas promotionnelle et restait pertinente, dans un contexte où les bibliothèques ne sont plus que des gardiennes de livres, elles organisent des activités.
- La page BAnQ fait partie du projet Sciences de l'information.
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Pour un article toujours à l'état d'ébauche, il est somme toute bien rédigé et le contenu est de qualité.
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: