User:Nymiak
Hi, you're wasting your time here. What secret message do you expect to see here?
Answer
[edit]There is no secret message at all, especially in white on this line.
Real Answer
[edit]There is absolutely no secret message here: HAHAHAHAHA I'M INVISIBLE! Well... Not anymore
Sandboxing
[edit]Because we all know it's better than regular boxing. Seriously. It's like boxing, except you can throw sand in your opponent's eyes to blind them while you do stuff.
Also, we note that it is rather awesome that LaTeX is supported!
Problems
[edit]Problem 1
[edit]Let p and q be natural numbers such that:
Prove that p is divisible by 1979[1][2].
Problem 2
[edit]Let be an equilateral triangle with point P inside such that . Find
Problem 3
[edit]This problem is left for the reader to construct.
Solutions
[edit]Hey, stop trying to cheat! These exercises are left for the reader to attempt. If you end up giving up, you can send an email to the almighty Anonymous, requesting a solution. Good luck getting one...
While you wait, go assist Julian!
Notes
[edit]This person totally does not have a mentor by the name of Paul. Absolutely not.
Another note is that he totally is not in a complicated relationship with anyone at all.
Assortment of Random and Cool Stuff
[edit]Python: "uggc://ra.jvxvcrqvn.bet/jvxv/Cnfpny'f_Jntre".encode('rot-13')
-1°K
What's an anagram of Banach Tarski? A: Banach Tarski Banach Tarski
4[3]
A biologist, a physicist, and a mathematician were sitting in a street café watching the crowd. Across the street they saw a man and a woman entering a building. Ten minutes later they reappeared together with a third person. “They have multiplied,” said the biologist. “Oh no, an error in measurement,” the physicist sighed. “If exactly one person enters the building now, it will be empty again,” the mathematician concluded.[4]
The Game
[edit]You have lost. Click here to become insane. But then again, you already are... That's right, you are just a bit insane.
Cheer up and drink some lemonade![5]
References
[edit]- ^ This problem was totally not stolen from an IMO paper
- ^ Also, an incredibly similar question definitely did not appear on a QAMT paper that asked for you to find a prime factor of such an expression
- ^ http://xkcd.com/221/
- ^ http://www.ams.org/notices/200501/fea-dundes.pdf
- ^ http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/macdonald/errh/101_analysis_bedtime_stories_(epsilon_red_riding_hood).pdf