User:Nrkjordaan/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Sports#American football
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I have a deep connection with all sports. They will always have a special place in my heart.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it does.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it does!
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Some in the boxes down below, yes.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it is.
- Is the content up-to-date? I think so , last updated in 2019.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, there is not any missing, nor anything that does not belong.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is!
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? None that I can point out.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, well organized, broken down into sections and have major points.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images included
- Are images well-captioned? None included.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/a
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?N/a
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? None come to mind at the moment!
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is part of WikiProjects yes,
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It does not differ, in a way we are all consumers.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Status is good!
- What are the article's strengths? Addresses all the major sports in America.
- How can the article be improved? it can add more detail for each section.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? almost complete. Need more information.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: