Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
Before Farming : Hunter-Gatherer Society and Subsistence. MASCA, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 1995.[1]
This is a research paper, so it should be a reliable source. It covers hunting and gathering societies so it should provide some evidence on the hunting hypothesis.
Haas R, Watson J, Buonasera T, et al. Female hunters of the early Americas. Science advances. 2020;6(45). doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0310
This is a peer reviewed study done by an accredited group of scientists.
Stoet G. Sex differences in search and gathering skills. Evolution and human behavior. 2011;32(6):416-422. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.03.001
This is a numerical study done by a group of psychologists at the Institute of Psychological Sciences, Leeds University, United Kingdom
Buss DM. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 5th Ed. / Buss, 2015. 8th ed.; 2015.
This is a book written by a Ph.D professor who has written more than 300 scientific articles and 6 books.
Ardrey R. The Hunting Hypothesis : a Personal Conclusion Concerning the Evolutionary Nature of Man. Atheneum; 1976.
This is a response to a very famous book from 1976 which criticized flaws and myths of the original.
