User:Neuropean/Warnings

Thank you for visiting my World of Warnings

I don't know how 'official' these warnings are, but as I feel that the editors concerned would have difficulty proving that thaey acted in an impartial way, I have moved them here. Neuropean 19:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Some people have accused me of 'celebrating' my warnings, however, I believe them to be partisan and biased. Some of them are themselves examples of failure to AGF. I have taken all suggestions on board and I honestly believe that I am a productive editor who makes the odd mistake rather than someone who consciously sets outr to disrupt wiki.Neuropean 21:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Advice Hi Neuropean

Your fellow editors are starting to note your mass nominations of various felines for deletion. Please ensure that you are familiar with the terms of WP:POINT, our policy of not disrupting Wikipedia in order to make or prove a point. You might like to limit yourself to one deletion nomination a day at most until you are established as an editor in case anyone thinks you are making a WP:POINT and acts accordingly. Thanks. ➨ ЯEDVERS 22:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Neuropean"

Actually, I'm very sure you are a sock account created solely to create WP:POINT disruption. Desist and find other ways to constructively contribute, or you'll be blocked for disruption. Syrthiss 12:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Neuropean"

No personal attacks please Please don't do this. Please see WP:NPA — there is no excuse for it. Thanks! Weregerbil 05:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC

Your report of WP:RFI Please do not make edits like these. They can be considered personal attacks. If you wish to report Robertsteadman as a sockpuppet I suggest you bring it up on WP:ANI. Also it is not a good idea to clear things off your talk page without archiving. It makes it look like you have things to hide. Petros471 18:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Well there is still some discussion ongoing about if and when warnings can be removed. It has been my experience that users who remove things off talk pages tend to be the controversial ones who either have received legitimate warnings and want to hide them, or deal badly with criticism meaning situations escalate unnecessarily. I don't think I've ever accused you of sockpuppetry (and if you were talking to Robertsteadman please use his talk page to do so rather than mine). I'm rather inclined to believe that you are using just this account, but has previously used another one (like you said on the RFI). That is no reason to repeatedly post in the way you did about Robertsteadman. As I said, if you want something done about him you'll have to try WP:ANI. Petros471 19:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)