User:Naomitrott/Blue revolution
 | This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Article Draft
[edit]The Blue Revolution refers to the significant growth and intensification of global aquaculture production - domestication and farming of fish, shellfish and aquatic plants- from the middle of the 20th century to present, particularly in underdeveloped countries.[1] The peak and subsequent stagnation of capture fishery production in the late 1980s spurred technological innovation and improved efficiency for aquaculture production.[1] Since then, aquaculture has grown exponentially and now represents the main source for global fish supply for direct human consumption and other purposes, and is a critical part of the global food system.[2][3] The Blue Revolution and expansion of aquaculture is expected to continue to grow, increasing by approximately 30% by 2030 from current levels.[2]
Emergence of the Blue Revolution
[edit]Prior to the 1980s, global fish supply from aquaculture did not represent a significant food source.[4] However, depletion of ocean fisheries and subsequent decline of capture fishery production caused aquaculture to grow rapidly.[4][5]From the mid-1980s to 2000, global aquaculture production increased by more than 50%, and cemented itself as a significant source for global fish supply.[5] Since 2000, aquaculture has been the fastest growing food production sector, growing 5.8% per year,[6] supplying over 100 metric tonnes of fish, shellfish and seaweeds from 425 species in 2017.[3][4]
The Blue Revolution was initially concentrated in Asia, and China in particular.[1][4][2] Aquaculture in Asian countries continues to dominate, accounting for 89% of global aquaculture production, with China alone accounts for 58% of global production.[2][3][4] However, it is also intensifying in other regions, with growth rates in South America, and more recently Africa, outpacing China.[3][4]
The Blue Revolution has driven and supported global increase in global fish consumption since the 1980s.[2][4] Over the last several decades, global fish consumption has increased 3.1% per year, and is primarily supplied through aquaculture.[2]
Freshwater Aquaculture
[edit]The Blue Revolution over the last two decades has increasingly been shaped by growth in freshwater aquaculture. Freshwater aquaculture, such as inland farming in rivers and lakes, is now the most significant contributor to aquaculture, and accounts for the majority supply of fish for direct human consumption.[2][3] South and Southeast Asia are the largest producers of freshwater aquaculture.[3] Rather than for export, freshwater aquaculture is largely produced for domestic use and consumption.[3] This has the potential to increase availability and accessibility of fish, but also presents challenges in terms of over-intensification, pollution of water sources, and introduction of diseases.[3]
Potential Benefits of the Blue Revolution
[edit]Food and Nutrient Security
[edit]The Blue Revolution has improved accessibility and availability of farmed fish in some regions, therefore potentially improving food and nutrient security, especially in low-income nations and rural populations.[1][2][7]
Increased aquaculture production has enabled a reliable fish supply that is more stable than wild fish catches.[7] Further, aquaculture’s boom has driven down the price of most farmed species, making them more affordable for low-income households.[7] Meanwhile, reduced wild fish stocks has increased the price of fish from other fishing industries and practices.[7] In recent decades, aquaculture in underdeveloped countries has mostly gone towards domestic consumption, rather than international trade.[3] Reduced prices and year-long predictable supply has allowed food insecure regions with high aquaculture production to improve food conditions for some of their most vulnerable populations.[7] Fish for direct human consumption are an excellent source for many important nutrients, such as omega 3-fatty acids, iodine, vitamin D, iron and calcium.[2] Fish are also a significant source of protein for much of the global population, providing over 3 billion people with about 20% of their animal protein.[2] In small-island states, and West Africa, fish provides up to 50% of protein intake.[8] Increased consumption of fish from the Blue Revolution can ameliorate conditions of nutrient deficiencies in low-income malnourished populations in underdeveloped regions. However, in some regions, such as Africa, fish consumption is expected to decrease in coming decades, potentially threatening food and nutrient security in existing vulnerable groups.[2]
Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation
[edit]The Blue Revolution and aquaculture activities play an important role in supporting livelihoods and reducing poverty, especially for rural populations.[9] In 2018, over 20 million people globally were employed and got their income from aquaculture related activities.[2] Generally, aquaculture can provide a higher income to low-income, rural households than agriculture.[10] In underdeveloped countries, many people rely on income from seafood production to support their livelihoods in addition to other sources of income.[8] This is especially true for small-scale aquaculture, which is most often practiced in rural areas.[10] Aquaculture also as positive indirect effects of poverty alleviation through spill-over from surplus income and employment linkages to those in jobs associated with fish farming.[10] The growth of freshwater aquaculture has helped provide income and reduce poverty, specifically in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.[3] For example, in Bangladesh, aquaculture activities facilitate per capita income to grow 2.1% between 2000 and 2010, reducing national poverty levels.[11]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Sachs, Jeffrey D. "The Promise of the Blue Revolution". Scientific American. Retrieved 2021-04-19.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. FAO. 2020. doi:10.4060/ca9229en. ISBN 978-92-5-132692-3.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Naylor, Rosamond L.; Hardy, Ronald W.; Buschmann, Alejandro H.; Bush, Simon R.; Cao, Ling; Klinger, Dane H.; Little, David C.; Lubchenco, Jane; Shumway, Sandra E.; Troell, Max (2021-03). "A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture". Nature. 591 (7851): 551–563. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6. ISSN 1476-4687.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b c d e f g Garlock, Taryn; Asche, Frank; Anderson, James; Bjørndal, Trond; Kumar, Ganesh; Lorenzen, Kai; Ropicki, Andrew; Smith, Martin D.; Tveterås, Ragnar (2020-01-02). "A Global Blue Revolution: Aquaculture Growth Across Regions, Species, and Countries". Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 28 (1): 107–116. doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1678111. ISSN 2330-8249.
- ^ a b Naylor, Rosamond L.; Goldburg, Rebecca J.; Primavera, Jurgenne H.; Kautsky, Nils; Beveridge, Malcolm C. M.; Clay, Jason; Folke, Carl; Lubchenco, Jane; Mooney, Harold; Troell, Max (2000-06). "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies". Nature. 405 (6790): 1017–1024. doi:10.1038/35016500. ISSN 0028-0836.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ "The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018". The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2018-07-23. doi:10.18356/8d6ea4b6-en. ISSN 2410-5902.
- ^ a b c d e Belton, Ben; Bush, Simon R.; Little, David C. (2018-03). "Not just for the wealthy: Rethinking farmed fish consumption in the Global South". Global Food Security. 16: 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.005. ISSN 2211-9124.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b Smith, Martin D.; Roheim, Cathy A.; Crowder, Larry B.; Halpern, Benjamin S.; Turnipseed, Mary; Anderson, James L.; Asche, Frank; Bourillón, Luis; Guttormsen, Atle G.; Khan, Ahmed; Liguori, Lisa A. (2010-02-12). "Sustainability and Global Seafood". Science. 327 (5967): 784–786. doi:10.1126/science.1185345. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 20150469.
- ^ F., Little, D.C. Barman, B.K. Belton, B. Beveridge, M.C. Bush, S.J. Dabaddle, L. Demaine, H. Edwards, P. Haque, M.M. Kibria, G. Morales, E. Murray, F.J. Leschen, W.A. Nandeesha, M.C. Sukadi, (2012). Alleviating poverty through aquaculture: progress, opportunities and improvements. OCLC 1127385894.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c "Give a Man a Fishpond: Modeling the Impacts of Aquaculture in the Rural Economy". World Development. 110: 205–223. 2018-10-01. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.023. ISSN 0305-750X.
- ^ Rashid, Shahidur; Minot, Nicholas; Lemma, Solomon (2019). "Does a "Blue Revolution" help the poor? Evidence from Bangladesh". Agricultural Economics. 50 (2): 139–150. doi:10.1111/agec.12472. ISSN 1574-0862.