Jump to content

User:NK560/Asian Americans in California/NatasaEleftheriou Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review

[edit]

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
    • Yes, I would suggest adding a section to your lead that shows how you added people to the article.
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
    • Yes, I feel like you might be able to clarify it more
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
    • yes
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
    • it gives an overall view so no i believe it is fine
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
    • it is not overly detailed

Content

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added relevant to the topic?
    • Yes it is
  • Is the content added up-to-date?
    • Yes
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
    • Nothing missing, keep adding people and maybe add section or 2 that talks about the people overall and grouping them

Tone and Balance

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added neutral?
    • yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • no
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • not that i found
  • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
    • no

Sources and References

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
    • yes, just cite them and you are good to go:)
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
    • Just add them and you are good!
  • Are the sources current?
    • they could be updated in the resource section
  • Check a few links. Do they work?
    • resource #2 link doesn't work

Organization

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
    • Yes and yes, just add your section
  • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
    • not that i found
  • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
    • Yes, it is pretty well organized, just add some paragraphs and pictures and I think you should be ready to go!

Images and Media

[edit]

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
    • It needs more images
  • Are images well-captioned?
    • it has no images
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
    • there are none so yes, just be careful when adding photos that they are ok to use
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
    • n/a


Overall impressions

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
    • Yes it has, Just keep working and I think you have already put in a ton of work so good job!
  • What are the strengths of the content added?
    • You added a really notable list of people and its very long and its wonderful
  • How can the content added be improved?
    • Just what you were saying with photos and maybe a section or two, photos are a really great way to update and make an article better so I would try to focus on that!

Overall evaluation

[edit]