Jump to content

User:Mjpresson/Essay page/Proposed permanent community ban of problematic user

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note: Tokerdesigner (talk · contribs) has been permanently banned from editing Cannabis-related pages on Wikipedia. This follows a 24-hr block, a 7-day block, and a 30-day block.

  • Continued soapboxing and incivility after second block ended:

[1] [2] [3][4][5][6][7]

  • [8]"Mjpresson...appears to be acting as an agent to promote a pro-cigarette-industry point of view on WP, therefore may have a conflict of interest which invalidates any claim to edit cannabis-related articles."
  • [9]* "What the hell are you threatening to do-- sic Joe Coffin on me?"
  • [10]:"...Mjpresson who pursues an agenda of attempting to remove from cannabis-related articles any information about...one-hitters...to hot burning overdose cigarette..."
  • [11]:Mj has more respect for it (a Coffin Joe dosage)? Or he is perhaps a sockpuppet for Big Tobackgo, trying to censor information about microdosage smoking equipment which will destroy his client's trillion-dollar profit empire built on sledgehammer overdose $igarettes.
  • [12]:"the huge disproportionate share of your edits which have been concerned with promoting a genre of "horror flicks" the hinteragenda of which appears to be to lure children into smoky theaters where they will inhale nicotine ("smoking restrictions" in Brasil are not up to date)-- how does all that stuff about Coffin Joe meet WP:Notability requirements?"
  • [13]:"My conjecture (which I will be so bold as to share with you here) is that Mj's agenda includes: Using Wikipedia to promote the interests of the cigarette industry..."
    "Congratulations to Mjpresson on not being personally a cigarette smoker; neither were Nixon and Reagan who pursued the war against cannabis alias "drugs" to benefit the cigarette industry; how does Mj administer hash without a one-hitter or a vaporizer?"
  • [14]:"Also I got detained by a mysterious curiosity to research the dark side of "Wikipedia" (or jMMpresson?). Sorry about the stroke and the alcohol"
  • [15]"The chain-smoking film-maker, [[José Mojica Marins, to whose WP biography [[User:MJPresson has contributed two hundred fifty seven (257) edits (is that a record?"
  • [16]"I note your hero/alter ego jMM, born 13 March 1936, is exactly 57 days older than my beloved big brother. I bet he is an exact-day birthmate of one of my brother's school friends that turned him against me. My brother, now retired, had a 30-year career with the Propa & Ganda Company which, while he was there, famously killed millions of trillions of germs. Now there's some death! Get Joe to make a movie about that company."
  • [17]:(Remember, I'm ghosthosting on various IP's to avoid getting caught by Big Wackgo.)
  • [18]Gaaaawd (i.e. tobackgo) must have sent you to hound me over cannabis edits.
  • [19]"I wouldn't mind abandoning the name "Tokerdesigner". For years I thought the word "toker" meant a utensil used for low-temperature smoking by sucking slow instead of the short hot puff used by $igarette addicts (when that goes beyond 2 seconds, it is known as a "bogart" after the film hero who died age 57 of $igarette cancer, what a drag).
  • [20][21][22]:Canvassing while under block debate, my name is mentioned 14 times in one diff, and falsely accused of initiating block (wasn't me)"proceedings initiated and urgently pressed by Mjpresson"
  • [23]:Posted an "urgent health notice" on Wikipedia because his anti-tobacco edits were being reverted, "'In the interest of urgent public health opportunity, please urgeuse WP:OR (WP:IAR) or "red links",as needed, to nudge researchers to verify the development of..."
  • Inappropriate contacting of user who banned him.
Article space
[edit]
  • Persistent refusal to provide allowable citations/Self-referencing. Tokerdesigner writes and cites[24] his own WikiHow entries to provide nonexistent citations, and defends this action[diff], as well as [25] routine use of Third person in referencing himself in debates, then leaving it unsigned to leave self-supporting opinions appearing as another to naive users.
  • Intrusive "diagram needed" template added to validate addition of these ascii diagrams[33]
  • Inability (refusal) to understand what this process is about[34]
These edits resulted in users third block.