User:Mervitan/Politics and technology/Maxack37 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing: User:Ishangill10
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ishangill10/sandbox
Lead
[edit]Lead evaluation
[edit]The lead for the article is pretty solid. I believe it does a good job capturing the overall points of the passage. I would change the style of the writing though to fit more of the "Wikipedia" tone.
Content
[edit]Content evaluation
[edit]The content of the article is fairly subjective. I would recommend reviewing the guidelines for Wikipedia-style writing and then trying to change the statements you make. Furthermore, there is only ONE source cited! I have no clue whether any statement you have made is true or not.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The tone of the article is not neutral. Furthermore, since there is only one source cited, I cannot tell if any statements made are true.
Sources and References
[edit]Sources and references evaluation
[edit]There is only one source. Refer to other comments.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]The organization of the article is fine. Please refer to other comments to fix the major errors of the article.
Images and Media
[edit]Images and media evaluation
[edit]Not applicable.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall evaluation
[edit]This article needs a lot of work for it to be usable. Only using one source is not acceptable and this must be changed so I can accurately tell if there is any truth to the statements written.