Jump to content

User:Meenagh/John Kenyon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Father John Kenyon

[edit]

Father John Kenyon was an Irish nationalist involved in the Young Ireland movement and the Irish Confederation. His strong political and religious views alienated him from many of his colleagues. He condemned the policies of Daniel O'Connell, and believed that his death was a blessing rather than a loss. He also, like John Mitchel, refused to condemn slavery. As a Catholic priest he believed that a northern Irish Presbyterian had the same chance of entering heaven as a southern Catholic priest. He was twice suspended from clerical duties.

Early life

[edit]

John Kenyon was born on 1 May 1812, at Thomondgate, Limerick City, Ireland. The family lived a comfortable existence as John’s father ran a successful stonecutting business, a public house and a grocery shop.[1] His mother was well known for her charity and kindness to the poor. She would regularly send out her children to less fortunate homes with food and other necessities.[2] Her kindness transferred to her son, John who throughout his life was renowned for his generosity towards the poor. Five of the six Kenyon children entered religious life.[3] Kenyon entered Maynooth Seminary in 1829 - the year of Catholic Emancipation. He was ordained to the priesthood six years later and immediately became actively involved in politics. His first appointment was to Ennis, Co. Clare where he published a scholarly pamphlet, entitled A discourse on the use and history of Christian Churches.[4] From there he was transferred to Silvermines, Co. Tipperary, where he initiated a major 'Buy Irish' campaign.[5] He was also deeply involved in the temperance movement under the leadership of Father Mathew. In 1842 Kenyon was transferred to Templederry where he spent the remainder of his life. When the Young Ireland party was established in that year, he was instantly attracted to their policies.[6] His life became a struggle between church and politics – his promotion of physical force alienating him from the majority of his clerical colleagues.

Famine

[edit]

The severity of the Great Famine led Kenyon to blame the entire event on the British. He went so far as to use his Sunday sermon to advise his congregation to teach their children to hate everything British.[7] Nonetheless, throughout the catastrophe he did everything humanly possible to alleviate the pain. As a member of the Dolla & Killeneave and the Templederry & Latteragh relief committees he worked tirelessly for his people.[8] Apart from normal relief measures, Kenyon established his own work scheme, whereby he employed locals to build a wall around his property. Amazingly, in such a time of hardship his work was stopped by the county surveyor, Mr Crawford, who insisted that planning regulations were being breached. A court case ensued, and Kenyon lost. The wall was demolished. John Kenyon then turned his attention to house building, and with local labour built Chapel House.[9] A Young Ireland colleague referred to it as ‘the house that Jack built’ while another remarked that it was ‘a realised dream of whimsicality.’ Chapel House, which welcomed James Fintan Lalor,John Mitchel’s family, John Martin, John Blake Dillon, Thomas Clark Luby, Thomas Francis Meagher, James Stephens and many other important figures of the day, was demolished in November 1986.[10]

Opposition to O'Connell

[edit]

It was quite extraordinary that a Catholic priest should promote physical force. But Kenyon was prepared to defend his views, and did so compellingly. He stated that no law, civil or ecclesiastical, made blood-shedding a crime. He noted that it was practiced by the Jews ‘under the immediate direction of the Almighty.’ The Fifth Commandment, he pointed out, only forbade ‘unjust blood-shedding.’ He went on to explain that there were soldiers among the first believers in Christ, and their faith was not weak. He stated that no political right was ever won in Ireland by moral force. The moral force which won Catholic Emancipation was laced with a fear of impending physical force: ‘It was not a mere spiritual phantasm divested of flesh and blood and divorced from the substratum of physical energy, so essential to its vigour, its vitality, and its effect. The moral force which won Emancipation was a firmly expressed demand for justice of resolute men; it was an overflowing treasury of the Catholic Association, every shilling of which stood for two stout arms and one brave heart.[11] The severity of the Great Famine led Kenyon to blame the entire event on the British. The scale of that catastrophe, coupled with his belief that the British government was not doing enough to alleviate the hardship, led him to despise not only the British but also Daniel O’Connell. He believed that the Liberator was playing into the hands of the government. He wrote of O’Connell’s leadership: ‘We have been guided, step by step, self-hoodwinked to such an abyss of physical and moral misery – to such a condition of helpless and hopeless degradation, as no race of mankind was ever plunged in since the creation. We are a nation of beggars – mean, shameless, and lying beggars. And this is where O’Connell has guided us.' [12] Kenyon believed that a leader should be truthful and honest. He felt that he should express his convictions – whether positive or negative – and not remain silent ‘from a silly apprehension of the consequences.’ He went on to emphasise the necessity of a leader being conscientious: ‘God gave everyone the gift of reason and it should be used. Conscience promotes honesty and openness. A conscientious leader rejects hypocrisy. Conscience spurns hypocrisy as a substitute for that truth for which it instinctively yearns.’ He suggested that a democratic, rather than dictatorial, attitude would accept varying viewpoints and that unanimity could rarely be achieved because of ‘the constitution of the human mind, with all its faculties.’ Therefore the leader should have tolerance and understanding. He believed O’Connell lacked both of those qualities.[13] When O’Connell died in May 1847 Kenyon wrote to the Nation criticising expressions of sympathy offered by the Young Irelanders. He questioned how they could have condemned him weeks previously, and yet eulogise him when he died. He stated that O’Connell’s death was no loss to the Irish nation. He went on: ‘On the contrary, I think that Mr. O’Connell has been doing before his death, and was likely to continue doing so long as he might live, very grievous injury to Ireland; so that I account his death rather a gain than a loss to this country.’[14] [15]

Young Ireland

[edit]

Despite the embarrassment caused by his criticism of O’Connell, Kenyon was of immense importance to the Young Ireland movement. Because the leadership consisted of Protestants and Presbyterians, as well as Catholics, the party was not trusted by the Catholic hierarchy. (The Catholic clergy almost totally supported O’Connell and the Repeal party.) Kenyon was the Young Ireland polemicist, and was seen in party circles as the person to win the support of the Catholic population. When John Mitchel was transported in 1848 Kenyon immediately replaced him as the radical extremist of the party. He visited Charles Gavan Duffy, along with Terence Bellew MacManus, and suggested the reorganisation of the Irish Confederation into a secret society, capable of acting as a quasi government in the event of a rising.[16] The suggestion was acted upon and the Confederation was disbanded.[17] A measure of the massive support that Kenyon was enjoying from his colleagues was illustrated by the fact that both he and Meagher were elected to the new organisation with the maximum thirty-one votes, while O’Brien, Duffy and Dillon got thirty.[18] Kenyon was now at his political zenith, and quickly replacing Mitchel – the only difference was that he was bringing the entire organisation with him, not just a few revolutionaries. John Kenyon’s involvement in the preparation for war caused serious concerns for his religious superiors.[19] When in April 1848, he encouraged a crowd of ten thousand people at Templederry to arm themselves; Dr Kennedy immediately suspended him from clerical duties. He was presented with an ultimatum to either give up politics or be expelled from the priesthood.[20] A compromise was arrived at whereby he agreed that he would not involve himself in the rising unless he considered that there was a reasonable chance of success. Unfortunately he did not explain this constraint to his colleagues – a fact that caused much misunderstanding and anger as the Confederates assembled in Ballingarry, Co. Tipperary a few weeks later. On Thursday 27 July as the Confederates assembled at Ballingarry, William Smith O’Brien dispatched Thomas Francis Meagher, John Blake Dillon, and Maurice Leyne to Templederry, to request Father Kenyon to lead out his men. It was intended that Kenyon’s leadership would extend the rising to North Tipperary, and into Limerick where Richard O’Gorman was awaiting orders.[21] Kenyon’s response was unexpected. He refused, stating that he was not prepared to become involved in ‘a bootless struggle.’ Meagher later referred to Ballingarry as ‘not a rising, but a blunder’ - a statement which supported Kenyon’s deduction. Later he wrote in the parish register: ‘This evening I have heard of a rebellion in South Tipperary under the leadership of William Smith O’Brien – may God speed it.’[22]

The Three Johns

[edit]

The ‘Three Johns’ – Mitchel, Kenyon and Martin – were a most unlikely trio. John Mitchel was the son of a Unitarian minister who had been a United Irishman in the 1790s. John Martin, a Presbyterian, from Co. Down, had a family background of opposition to the 1798 Rising.[23] John Kenyon, a Catholic curate based in Templederry, Co. Tipperary, expounded the merits of physical force, as opposed to the moral force ideal espoused by Daniel O’Connell. The Young Ireland movement brought the three together in a friendship that lasted a lifetime. Prior to his transportation, John Mitchel was a regular visitor to the mountains of Tipperary. His wife, Jenny, and her children visited Templederry and spent six months at Chapel House in 1848.[24] A few years later Kenyon accompanied them to England, as they commenced their long journey of reunification with their loved one. John Martin was a regular guest of Father Kenyon. The views of all three men were similar, with Mitchel and Kenyon very strong in their refusal to condemn slavery. Kenyon earned himself the title of ‘Slave tolerating priest from Tipperary.’ All three were committed to physical force as a means of attaining freedom. After 1848 they met on three occasions in Paris. The final meeting was in 1866. The resulting portrait of the ‘Three Johns’ marked the occasion. As Kenyon and Martin returned home, Mitchel remarked: ‘Well, I feel melancholy; poor Father Kenyon! He is going rapidly. I bade him good-bye today – something tells me he and I shall never meet on this side of the grave.’[25] Within three years Kenyon was dead.

Slavery

[edit]

Kenyon was known as ‘the slave tolerating priest from Tipperary,’ due to his constant refusal to condemn slavery.[26] His views initially came to light when the Irish Confederation was discussing the issue of donations from America. He maintained that regardless of their origin, all donations should be accepted. The issue arose when James Haughton, a Quaker, and a strong moral force campaigner, insisted that the new organisation should be totally committed not only to anti-slavery but to teetotalism and the abolition of capital punishment. Haughton stated that he ‘would indignantly refuse the bloodstained contributions of American slaveholders.’ Kenyon, however, suggested that to refuse such subscriptions would be erroneous. In response he used the analogy of being selective in accepting help in the case of a drowning. He wondered if a drowning person was offered help by an undesirable, ‘would he spurn the offer, spit in the decent man’s face and choose rather to feed a pair of crocodiles, from sheer virtuous indignation?’ He made it quite clear what he himself would do with such subscriptions: ‘It is quite an error to suppose that our great and noble cause would be polluted by receiving such contributions, or that it must not be injured by rejecting them. I would accept their aid, and thank them for it, to repeal this abominable Union. He refused to condemn slavery on the basis that the scriptures did not condemn it, and the Catholic Church never defined it as a crime: ‘Priests and bishops owned slaves, and perhaps in some areas the practice continues. It may be that slaveholding will be eliminated from Christendom by a fashionable theory of developments. It may be that it will vanish from the earth more naturally. It may be too that it will not. The coil is tangled, I apprehend.’[27] His continued: ‘We are all slaves in a thousand senses of the word – slaves to time, to space, to circumstance, to the whims of our maternal ancestors in all their nonsensical generations; to fire, air, earth and water. If to all these slaveries there be added one other – namely, slavery to slaveholders – I cannot see that our position will be essentially deteriorated.’ He compared American slavery to the oppression of the Irish people: ‘If it is true that they [slave holders] maltreat their negroes half as much as our poor Irish slaves are maltreated by their English masters, may God forgive them. For their transgressions, at the worse, shall no more convince the slavery system of evil, than the cruelty of exterminating landlords shall prove that the condition of tenant farming is unchristian, or profligacy in family relations, that the marriage state is unholy.’ He concluded that ‘flinging back bags of dollars over the Atlantic ocean into the pockets of these slaveholders, enriching them at our expense, is such a Utopian remedy for the supposed evil as only homoeopathists could countenance.’ He advised those who disagreed with his views to mind their own business, wait until the Union was repealed, and then when Irish problems were solved it may be appropriate to ‘set about abating it with our surplus funds.[28]

Religious toleration

[edit]

John Kenyon showed amazing toleration towards people of other religions. The fact that his two closest friends were Presbyterians, clearly illustrate this point. At a time when the Catholic hierarchy were distancing themselves from the Protestant landlord class, Kenyon was a frequent visitor at Castle Otway, the seat of the local landlord.[29] He counted among his friends the Protestant rector of Templederry, and always emphasised that the Irish struggle involved everyone in the land – not just Catholics. He believed that the soul of a Presbyterian Irishman is as valuable in the sight of Christ as that of a Catholic priest or bishop.[30]

A wondrous intellect

[edit]

John Kenyon died at Chapel House, in his adopted parish of Templederry, Co. Tipperary, on 21 March 1869. His health had been failing for a number of years.[31] John Mitchel, on hearing of his death, wrote: ‘The wondrous intellect is quenched at last, the brightest, keenest mind, and most genial and loving nature, the most complete model of manhood at its best, has passed away.’[32]

Quotations

[edit]
  • Speak the truth out like a man, speak it always out, and fear not the result.
  • Truth and justice can never injure man or nation.
  • Truth never dies, though it may grow old.
  • Truth is power.
  • Truth and virtue are the kernel for all good.
  • Fear no man. Fear no government. Fear God above alone.
  • Simplicity is the distinguishing character of those great laws and principles by which God governs the universe.
  • Content yourself with the ten commandments of God, until you should have full time to consider how they were to be improved upon.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Pigot's Directory. 1824.
  2. ^ Fogarty, L (1918). Father John Kenyon, A Patriot Priest of '48. p. 7.
  3. ^ Boland, Tim (2011). Father John Kenyon, The Rebel Priest. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-901370-36-2.
  4. ^ Killaloe Diocesean Archives. Ennis.
  5. ^ "Limerick Reporter". 20/11/1840. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ "Tipperary Vindicator". 19/06/1844. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ "Tipperary Vindicator". 08/04/1846. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Grace, Daniel (2000). The Great Famine in Nenagh Poor Law Union.
  9. ^ Boland, Tim (2011). Father John Kenyon, The Rebel Priest. pp. 103–112.
  10. ^ See N.L.I. Otway Papers MS 13004(4).
  11. ^ "Limerick Reporter See also Nation". 12/08/1846. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. ^ Father John Kenyon, The Rebel Priest. pp. 63–76.
  13. ^ Duffy, Charles Gavan (1880). Young Ireland, A Fragment of Irish History. p. 82.
  14. ^ Royal Irish Academy. Minutes of the Irish Confederation.
  15. ^ "Nation". 05/06/1847. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ Duffy, Charles Gavan (1898). My Life in Two Hemispheres. pp. 277–8.
  17. ^ Duffy, Charles Gavan (1863). Four Years in Irish History. pp. 604–8.
  18. ^ RIA. Minutes of Irish Confederation MS 23 H 44.
  19. ^ Killaloe Diocesean Archives.
  20. ^ Gwynn, Denis (1949). Irish Ecclessastical Journal. LXXI. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  21. ^ NLI. O'Brien Papers MS 442 2416.
  22. ^ Templederry Parish Register. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  23. ^ Sillard, P. Life of John Martin. p. 142.
  24. ^ Boland, Tim. Father John Kenyon, The Rebel Priest. pp. 205–14.
  25. ^ Dillon, William (1888). Life of John Mitchel. p. 146.
  26. ^ Murphy, I. The Diocese of Killaloe 1800-50. p. 195.
  27. ^ "Nation". 22/01/1847. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  28. ^ "See also Tipperary Vindicator". 23/01/1847. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ NLI. Otway Papers MS 13004.
  30. ^ Fogarty, L. Father John Kenyon.
  31. ^ "Tipperary Advocate". 03/04/1869. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  32. ^ Irishman (10/04/1869). {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)