At this stage was shown to be less than or equal to which is correct but if this is done the conclusion of the proof is:
will increase without bound if , so this method does not prove the general case that is bounded. (When there is a divide-by-zero problem as well.)
A possible although unwieldy solution is to replace k! with something other than . I propose a complete solution as follows:
(using as the ceiling function):
therefore:
is a GP, so using with as the number of terms and as the growth per term:
But for all :
So
therefore:
which is a bound independent of