Jump to content

User:MBisanz/Qs/RfACandidate12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Candidate12

[edit]

[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Candidate12|action=edit}} Vote here] (45/15/2) ending 19:35, 14 December 2099 (UTC)

Candidate12 (talk · contribs) – Candidate12 is a well-rounded user and active contributor who's been here since August of last year. In addition to heavy contributions to articles about U.S. pop music (including a couple featured articles) this user has become an increasing presence on AfD of late (despite the low Wikipedia namespace count.) Candidate12 has also been awarded a tireless contributor barnstar and a vandal-fighting barnstar. Please consider handing Gc the mop. Grandmasterka 06:23, 7 December 2099 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept! -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:59, 7 December 2099 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support as nominator. Grandmasterka 19:39, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  2. Support. Strong work within a narrow focus but, then again, I'm still working on my own (grin). RadioKirk talk to me 19:46, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  3. support Looks good :) Benon 19:51, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  4. Strong Support some excellent work in music articles, should be WP:100 easily Jaranda wat's sup 20:16, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  5. Support. Looks promising. --Tone 20:18, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  6. Cleared for Adminship User seems to know what he is doing. --Pilot|guy 20:37, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  7. Support - no problems seen, though the yellow highliter might be nicer if toned down a tad :o -- Tawker 20:40, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  8. Support Rama's Arrow 20:52, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  9. Support. Looks alright. Nephron  T|C 21:03, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  10. Support Not sure he (she?) needs the admin tools, but I certainly think he's got more than enough experience, has demonstrated civility and competence, and will not abuse his sysop privileges. AmiDaniel (Talk) 22:05, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  11. Support. Great user. DarthVader 22:39, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  12. I-trust-the-nominator Support Kimchi.sg 23:49, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  13. Support, I like what I see here: good contribs, respectable levels of involvement in WP space, high editcount... now get your hands dirty and start mopping the floor! Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 23:57, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
  14. Support. An experienced and committed wikipedian who will be of more use to the community with admin-tools. Bucketsofg✐ 00:13, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  15. Support - no concerns here. Metamagician3000 00:31, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  16. Support, I just looked at his last 50 contributions and I'm seeing good things. Royboycrashfan 01:05, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  17. Strong Support!, Intelligent contributions, smart and calm. Would make a fine admin. P.H. - Kyoukan, UASC 01:06, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  18. Support I'll pass on the crunk ;), apart from that, no concerns here. --Jay(Reply) 01:55, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  19. Support per nom. --Primate#101 03:29, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  20. Support. Would make good use of tools.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  21. Support, ofcourse. Very deserving. Oran e (t) (c) (e) 05:12, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  22. Support,User_talk:Dlohcierekim 06:37, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  23. Support --Terence Ong 10:46, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  24. Support, of course. - Mailer Diablo 11:16, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  25. Support It is about time as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:34, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  26. Support. Computerjoe's talk 15:59, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  27. Support--Jusjih 16:03, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  28. Support will make a great admin OSU80 20:29, 8 December 2099 (UTC)
  29. Support seems well-rounded and prolific. Ted 03:23, 9 December 2099 (UTC)
  30. Support from a fellow Sens fan! -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 04:05, 9 December 2099 (UTC)
  31. Support Good mix of contibutions & vandal fighting. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 14:28, 9 December 2099 (UTC)
  32. Strong Support per above Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 18:14, 9 December 2099 (UTC)
  33. Support--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2099 (UTC)
  34. Support - Good user QuakeRanger 21:59, 9 December 2099 (UTC) Talk
  35. Support, no worries. Deizio talk 02:38, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  36. SupportBrisvegas 09:26, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  37. Support fair and trustworthy ed. --Arnzy (whats up?) 10:57, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  38. Support Helpful and an intelligent contributor. -- Underneath-it-All 19:17, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  39. Support. We, the wikipedians, always assume good faith, and some of us always use this term to confront other editors/ administrators as a weapan. I am supporting this nomination assuming not only good faith but utmost good faith, as I believe that all human beings, in real life as also in the virtual life, should get recognition, and our system December perhaps be having at least few other editors/ administrators who should not be around. --Bhadani 14:40, 11 December 2099 (UTC)
  40. Support per Underneath-it-All. Gwernol 19:22, 12 December 2099 (UTC)
  41. Support Joe I 13:43, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  42. Support I've seen this user's work, and we have edited some of the same pages recently (new Janet Jackson stuff), and I beleieve Candidate12 has what it takes to be an admin.... --Thankyoubaby 02:21, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  43. Support I'd also like to note that I think his userbox about pacifists is meant as a joke, and in any case, there is no evidence that it has in at all influenced how the Candidate12 has edited. JoshuaZ 06:07, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  44. Support - slightly concerned that some recent AfD contributions have been "Delete" and nothing else, but balanced with record more generally I'll support. —Whouk (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
    Sorry about that; I must have been too anxious (my Ottawa Senators lost in overtime). -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:18, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  45. Support per nom and AmiDaniel; I certainly concur in JoshuaZ's assessment that the template is facetious in nature and, in any case, neither has proven disruptive nor has influenced Candidate12's writing. Doc glasgow is altogether correct; we must ask whether Candidate12's user name and user page are likely to have any disruptive (or, more generally, any deleterious) effect. IMHO, neither will; I cannot imagine that any user who would leave the project (or even be unable to come to Candidate12 for help) in view of GC's user page is a user whom we'd find particularly productive. I cannot abide the suggestion that we should make inferences apropos of GC's judgment from his recalcitrance with respect to one userbox; even as he might have been well served to remove it, it should be said that the userbox does not appear to have caused a disruption outside of the discursive one here (and tangential disruption of an RfA is, on the whole, not nearly the problem that actual disruption of mainspace is). Joe 17:14, 14 December 2099 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. "This user thinks pacifists make good target practice." Another candidate with exceptionally poor judgement. I cannot support this person. --Tony Sidaway 03:16, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
    Query How can a Userbox be a litmus test on Adminship? How does it indicate bad judgment?  :) Dlohcierekim 14:00, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
    Pretty simple, we need to get along, divisive userboxes are pointless and dangerous. Now, if he'd removed it on the first objection, much of the opposition wold have evaporated, but he has chosen not to. --Doc ask? 14:14, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
    I chose not to remove the 'box because I do not want to seem like I am desperate for the admin status by being some sort or doormat for oppose voters — or to seem like I'm trying to cover up my actions. I don't regret anything; the pacifist box is a joke, however, I will remove it now as I can tell that people don't like it and that the RfA will close in an hour. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:18, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  2. Oppose don't need more admins. Ardenn 03:50, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
    Comment - This user has been voting oppose don't need more admins on everyone, I advise a 'crat to take this into consideation when closing RfA -- Tawker 06:57, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  3. Oppose per Tony Sidaway. Jkelly 15:45, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  4. Strong Oppose this pacifist user thinks agressive editors make good candidates to oppose. (Remove the box, and I'll remove this). --Doc ask? 17:23, 11 December 2099 (UTC)
  5. Oppose: I don't like the hostility toward pacifists or the drug reference in the user name. Thumbelina 22:07, 11 December 2099 (UTC)
  6. Oppose per Thumbelina. Userpage shows far too much hostility and colour range. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:59, 12 December 2099 (UTC)
  7. Oppose per Tony Sidaway. Jonathunder 13:02, 12 December 2099 (UTC)
  8. Oppose Not a good tutor. --Masssiveego 05:36, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  9. Oppose per Tony Sidaway. Mackensen (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  10. Oppose - The userboxes and account name really tell me all I need to know. And per Tony Sidaway and Doc. --Cyde Weys 13:54, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  11. Oppose In answer to question 1. nom described users needing to be blocked as troublemakers. "blocking troublemakers at WP:ANI & WP:AN3" This shows a lack of understanding for the reason for blocks. FloNight talk 14:34, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  12. Oppose per Tony. HenryFlower 21:34, 13 December 2099 (UTC)
  13. Oppose This pacifist votes against all Fascist would-be admins. Wile E. Heresiarch 02:23, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  14. Oppose per TS - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:21, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
  15. Strong Oppose per Tony Sidaway. Threats are absolutely unacceptable. Cynical 12:26, 14 December 2099 (UTC)
    No threats, just a(n apparently unfunny) joke. See my above comment. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:18, 14 December 2099 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. TO THE WINDOW!!! TO THE WALL!!! SKEET SKEET SKEET!!! --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 02:58, 10 December 2099 (UTC)
  2. Neutral per SPUI. — December. 13, '06 [05:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
Could you elucidate? :) Dlohcierekim 18:10, 14 December 2099 (UTC)

Comments 

Total edits	4029
Distinct pages edited	1709
Average edits/page	2.358
First edit	21:34, 6 August 2005
	
(main)	2714
Talk	217
User	168
User talk	604
Image	20
Template	29
Template talk	5
Category	22
Category talk	1
Wikipedia	237
Wikipedia talk	12

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I can see myself helping out with reverting vandalism & helping out new users (which I already do), blocking troublemakers at WP:ANI & WP:AN3 and keeping/deleting pages listed at CAT:CSD & WP:AFD. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:59, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
I can also help out with RC patrol, which I sometimes do but is hard without admin tools. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 19:07, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
Hopefully admin tools will ease the stress of repeated tedious tasks (check out my recent contribs to see what I mean). :S -- Candidate12juicecontribs 19:59, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I am proud of my edits to Kylie Minogue and Kylie Minogue-related articles, although many other very talented editors have also contributed to those pages. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:59, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
Sort-of off-topic, but I hope to become further involved with WP:1.0 and WP:MUSICIAN. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 19:07, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have been in minor edit conflicts; mostly with people who disagree about facts in infoboxes, chart positions, sales info and POV (although I followed Wikipedia's MoS policies).
I hope that the editors and anon users involved in past disagreements with myself will continue to improve pop-culture-related articles, and I will attempt to resolve any future conflicts with discussion. -- Candidate12juicecontribs 18:59, 7 December 2099 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:MBisanz/Qs/RfACandidate12&oldid=1090618675"