User:Lady Halfwolf/Digital repatriation/Gainag Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Lady Halfwolf
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lady%20Halfwolf/Digital_repatriation?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Digital repatriation
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]Lead
[edit]The editor does not provide an updated lead to reflect any of the information they added in their sandbox draft. A brief mention of the software and technology made available to originating cultures to gain control over their heritage would be a sufficient addition.
Content
[edit]The content is highly relevant to the topic of the article. There is a lot of research being done in this area and it is constantly changing, which is reflected in the very current secondary sources used to back up the information presented.
Tone and Balance
[edit]The information is presented in a neutral tone, free from bias and persuasion. The existing article provides a good balance in viewpoints between originating cultures and scholarly organizations and the various aspects of how digital repatriation affects both positions.
Sources and References
[edit]The sources are quite up to date, all less than 10 years old.
Organization
[edit]The new headings will make welcome additions to the main wiki article, adding necessary sections on Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Software and Technology developed to better reflect efforts made in understanding and supporting the originating cultures drive to control their traditional knowledge.
Images and Media
[edit]The editor has not added any images or media to their draft. Perhaps the editor could add images from the various projects covered in their draft.
Overall Impressions
[edit]The article is well written, free of any large grammatical and spelling errors, presenting the information in a focused and neutral manner. I have done research on Mukurtu CMS and TK Labels for a previous course project and I am doing more research for a course this semester that includes the relationship between North American Indigenous people and museum curation and I really appreciate the additions you are making to this wiki article.