User:Knaf22/Laudatio Turiae
This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Intro
[edit]“Laudatio Turiae ("In praise of Turia") is a tombstone engraved with a carved epitaph that is a husband's eulogy of his wife. It was made in the late 1st century BC. It portrays the love of a husband for his loyal wife.”
Laudatio Turiae ("In praise of Turia") is a woman’s epitaph written by her husband. Created in the late 1st century BC, it depicts a husband’s love for his loyal wife.
Tombstone
[edit]The frequently moving eulogy inscribed on the stone is addressed from a husband to his deceased wife, lauding her virtues, self-sacrificing love, and unflinching loyalty toward him when she was still alive. The stone itself is broken, and parts have been found scattered around the city of Rome, although some sections remain lost. At 180 lines, the "Laudatio Turiae" is currently the longest surviving personal inscription from Classical Rome.
Discovered in (date), Laudatio Turiae is (physical specs., composition) and at 180 lines, is currently the longest surviving personal inscription from, Classical Rome (Citation). Portions of the stone have been found around Rome and some sections remain lost. The epitaph was describes an unknown Roman man’s appreciation for his virtuous, self-sacrificing, loyal wife and how loyal she was in life.
Inscription
[edit]The inscription gives a unique insight into the late 1st century Roman world during the rise of Augustus Caesar, as its extended history of the life of the author's wife addresses many aspects of Roman society and civil life. The wife's selfless deeds in defense of her persecuted husband range from sending him jewelry and money when he was in exile to offering him a divorce so he could have an heir—the couple was unable to have a child together. Her husband also lovingly describes her virtues, among which he includes weaving, obedience, faithfulness to family, and religious purity. According to the inscription, her first accomplishment worthy of praise was avenging her parents’ murder, which gives a rather surprising look into the roles of women within the family and society. The husband also says the marriage was unusual, because it lasted forty years with her dying first while he was much older. One of the few named figures in the inscription is Marcus Lepidus, who refused to reinstate the husband despite Caesar's order to do so. The husband praises his wife's willingness to endure verbal and physical abuse from Lepidus on his behalf as she attempted to plead the husband's case publicly.
The inscription gives a unique insight into the late 1st century Roman world during the rise of Augustus Caesar, as the detailed history of the life of the author's wife addresses many aspects of Roman society and civil life. The epitaph describes how the author’s late wife avenged her parents’ murder and how it was her first praiseworthy accomplishment. The wife's selfless deeds in defense of her persecuted husband range from sending him jewelry and money when he was in exile to offering him a divorce so he could have an heir—the couple was unable to have a child together. Her husband also lovingly describes her virtues, among which he includes weaving, obedience, faithfulness to family, and religious purity. The husband also says the marriage was unusual, because it lasted forty years with her dying first while he was much older. One of the few named figures in the inscription is Marcus Lepidus, who refused to reinstate the husband (reinstate what?) despite Caesar's order to do so. The husband praises his wife's willingness to endure verbal and physical abuse from Lepidus on his behalf as she attempted to plead the husband's case publicly.
History
[edit]This inscription is traditionally known as the "Laudatio Turiae," "The Praise of Turia," because its subject was generally identified with Curia, the wife of Quintus Lucretius Vespillo, consul in 19 BC, on the basis of comparison with the histories of Valerius Maximus (6, 7, 2) and Appian (Bell.civ. 4, 44), which report that Turia saved her husband in much the same way described in the inscription. William Warde Fowler stated, "...there is a very strong probability that her name was Turia, and that he was the certain Q. Lucretius Vespillo..."
However, the extant remains of the Laudatio Turiae are missing the fragmented piece that contains the identities of both the husband and wife, so they are not actually named on the extant inscription. As a result, the identification with Turia is no longer generally accepted.
This inscription is traditionally known as the "Laudatio Turiae," (and or?) "The Praise of Turia," because its subject was generally identified with Curia, the wife of Quintus Lucretius Vespillo, who was consul in 19 BC. Due to the comparison with the histories of Valerius Maximus (6, 7, 2)(?) and Appian (Bell.civ. 4, 44) which report that Turia saved her husband similarly to the way the inscription describes. William Warde Fowler stated, "...there is a very strong probability that her name was Turia, and that he was the certain Q. Lucretius Vespillo..."(citation, grammar)
The missing fragments of the Laudatio Turiae contain the identities of both the husband and wife and as a result, the identification with Turia is no longer generally accepted. (Reasoning?, citation)
Location
[edit]The Laudatio Turiae is currently housed in the Museo Nazionale Romano at the Terme di Diocleziano (Baths of Diocletian) in Rome.
Sandbox Notes & Considerations
[edit]Note to self: Addition of eulogy from funeral. Not only epitaph
It may be helpful to have a description of the tombstone. Dimensions and material composition would be useful for imagining scale. Also, listing the number of portions that have survived (Such as what is identified in the photo).
The Inscription subsection has no sources listed, makes claims about notable figure being referenced. A source would be great as this section reads more as an essay.
“At 180 lines, the "Laudatio Turiae" is currently the longest surviving personal inscription from Classical Rome.” - A source is needed
Bibliography
[edit]References
- ^ Gordon, Arthur E. (1950). "A New Fragment of the Laudatio Turiae". American Journal of Archaeology. 54 (3): 223–226. doi:10.2307/500300. ISSN 0002-9114.
- ^ Lange, C. H. (2016-04). "THE LAUDATIO TURIAE - J. Osgood Turia. A Roman Woman's Civil War. Pp. xvi + 215, ills, map. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Paper, £18.99, US99). ISBN: 978-0-19-983235-4 (978-0-19-983234-7 hbk)". The Classical Review. 66 (1): 212–214. doi:10.1017/S0009840X15001699. ISSN 0009-840X.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Horsfall, Nicholas (1983). "SOME PROBLEMS IN THE "LAUDATIO TURIAE"". Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies (30): 85–98. ISSN 0076-0730.
- ^ BOATWRIGHT, MARY T. (2011). "Women and Gender in the Forum Romanum". Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-). 141 (1): 105–141. ISSN 0360-5949.
- ^ Hemelrijk, Emily A. (2004). "Masculinity and Femininity in the "Laudatio Turiae"". The Classical Quarterly. 54 (1): 185–197. ISSN 0009-8388.
- ^ Lindsay, Hugh (2004). "The "Laudatio Murdiae" : Its Content and Significance". Latomus. 63 (1): 88–97. ISSN 0023-8856.