User:Kelleyschiedler/SOB X RBE/NatasaEleftheriou Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
  • BettyChipman and Kelleyschiedler
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kelleyschiedler/SOB X RBE

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • It can have a bit mote detail but yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
  • yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
  • no
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
  • no
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
  • it is concise and not overly detailed

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • yes
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • yes it is pretty up to date
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • No

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • it is neutral
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • No
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • no
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • no it does not

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • yes
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • yes
• Are the sources current?
  • some are from 2018 and 2019 so yes pretty current
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • yes

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • yes very easy to read
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • not that i found
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • yes

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • yes maybe add individual pictures of each rapper next to biography
• Are images well-captioned?
  • yes
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • yes
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • yes, also add more pictures and you guys should be set

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • yes
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • More content was added and more sections
• How can the content added be improved?
  • more pictures forsure can make the article even better