User:Keithbob/Collusion
WillBeback gets assistance from his POV Team: Tuckerj1976 and Jmh649[Doc James]
[edit]These three posts appear in close succession on my User Page [1]
- Kbob, I've placed some questions about your "POV Pushing Teams" tables, at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Evidence#POV Pushing Teams. When you have a chance, your reply would be appreciated. Will Beback talk 00:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Kbob, I too have placed a question about these. I am somewhat confused. Clarification would be helpful. Thanks Tuckerj1976 (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Kbob, I have also asked for action here per your comments. Are we to assume this will be addressed in your next edit? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuckerj1976 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
These posts then appear in rapid succession on the Evidence Talk Page[2]
- An editor has added two tables labeled "POV Pushing Team: WillBeback, Fladrif, KalaBethere..... " It's news to me that I am leading a "POV Pushing Team". Could Keithbob please explain what POV I am pushing, and how the noticeboard postings listed have been instrumental in pushing that POV? Also, the table is not quite accurate (Littleolive oil seems to be missing from a couple of entries) - it might be better to link to archives rather than diffs in this table.. Does Keithbob think that the problems with the article are due to my participation or my engagement in noticebaord discussions? Will Beback talk 00:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Will I'll double check my sources to make sure that the tables are accurate. You are welcome to present your evidence or rebuttal in your own section.-- — Kbob • Talk • 00:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- As it stands, it appears that you are making an unsupported accusation. Will Beback talk 00:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I too have already questioned Kbob ref these tables and am equally confused as to what point he is attempting to make. An answer would be helpful Tuckerj1976 (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I cannot find any inaccuracies in the chart. If there is a specific mistake that you would like to bring to my attention please post it on my user page. I want the chart to be 100% accurate. Thank you-- — Kbob • Talk • 02:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am not sure what the point of this table is to tell you truth. Doc James (Jmh649) (talk · contribs · email) 02:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry Kbob but you still haven't explained the point of the tables. What exactly are you trying to say with them? 02:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuckerj1976 (talk • contribs)