User:Kackem/Kariba Dam/Giacorbett Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]User: Kackem
Article: Kariba Dam
Lead
[edit]Lead evaluation
[edit]The lead gives a basic description of the topic of the article and all information in the lead is mentioned later in the article.
Content
[edit]Content evaluation
[edit]The content added is relevant to the article's subject and to the section of the article it is in. The content is up-to-date and deals with a historically underrepresented population.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The content is neutral and does not show bias to a side or viewpoint. The tone of the added section is informative and not persuasive.
Sources and References
[edit]Sources and references evaluation
[edit]The sources are current and all links work. The sources are written by different authors and seem to be reliable sources.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]The content is easy to read and makes sense. There are no spelling errors and only one or two grammar errors.
Images and Media
[edit]Images and media evaluation
[edit]There are no images or media added to the article.
For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
New Article Evaluation
[edit]The article is a pre-existing article.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall evaluation
[edit]The content added is important and makes the overall article more complete. It expands on topics briefly mentioned in the article and adds relevant and current information. The content is written and organized well and it is easy to understand. The article could be improved by adding media or expanding further on the Basilwizi Trust.