User:KGirlTrucker81/Difference between good faith and bad faith
![]() | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Northern_terminus_of_Interstate_30%2C_Little_Rock%2C_AR.jpg/199px-Northern_terminus_of_Interstate_30%2C_Little_Rock%2C_AR.jpg)
So, you're actually doing right, wrong or intentionally damaging the project? There's a difference between good and bad faith especially disruptive editors and trolls want to get around and annoy the community.
Good faith
[edit]A good faith editor means who help improve the encyclopedia, not trying to do harm to the project and done little damage (sometimes we do make mistakes as part our learning). Some editors (even they new, inexperienced) try to be BOLD before edits are saved and attract editors to decide whether to revert or not or discuss it on the talk page for consensus to avoid edit warring.
Bad faith
[edit]A bad faith editor means who intentionally to damage the project or only to cause disruption. This includes vandals, and other disruptive editors who end up being blocked from editing temporarily or either indef.
See? That is really simple advice for editors who don't understand the difference between good and bad faith.