User:Jwills725/EvaluateAnArticle
The article servant leadership has multiple issues although all the information in the article is relevant to the topic. For one, I was very distracted while reading. The grammar was a distraction for me and it made the article a bit difficult to read. Secondly, the attempt at defining servant leadership in the first paragraph was a distraction for me because it was broad and uninformative. The concept of what exactly servant leadership is, was poorly defined. Another issue I found while reading was a few of the links for the articles were not working thus making the claims unsupported. Lastly, although the work is presented in a neutral fashion, many of the facts are again unsupported.
This article has multiple issues and poorly rated, there are many improvements that can be made for the servant leadership article. First, the article does not comply with Wikipedia’s layout guidelines. Secondly, the definition of servant leadership needs major improvement. Third, experimentation articles that are peer-reviewed will help improve this article; making all claims supported thus giving the reader a clear understanding while remaining neutral.
There are conversations on the talk page of this article. Many fellow editors found this article poorly written. From explaining that leadership and management are interchangeable. Even mentioning that there is only one mention of Islam’s view on servant leadership. One editor mentions issues in the concluding sentence. The last sentence makes a claim with no citation and that it is considered a synthesis which is something Wikipedia tries to avoid. Many agree on the issues of the this article.
The article organizational behavior has multiple issues although all the information in the article is relevant to the topic. Organizational behavior is vague and poorly defined in the paragraph. This was very distracting as a reader because I could not move forward without a full understanding of the what organizational behavior is. Another issue is the connection between I-o psych without distinguishing between. This is mentioned in the talk page. Another distraction is the mention of the three levels of organizational behavior with no explanation.
This article has multiple issues and poorly rated, there are many improvements that can be made for organizational behavior article. Firstly, is the improvement to the definition. Secondly, the research methods used, more articles that are reliable would help improve the article. Clear following of the Wikipedia structure will help the article. I think there could be mention of some disadvantages. Among the issues, improvement can be made to help the article.
There are conversations on the talk page of this article discussing the issues of article. IO Psych is mentioned without making it clear to the reader between the two. Secondly an editor mentions the poor reliable sources. Many of the statements are unsupported but are presented as factual. The talk page editors also mention connection social psychology with the topic of the article. There are overall many talks on this page about improving this article that has many issues.