User:Joselv83/sandbox

This is the user sandbox of Joselv83. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Hi!

UBX

Trying to make a Userbox.

Wikipedia: Edit wars example

This edit war has to do with Abortion.

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Abortion&offset=20120428135404&action=history

This edit meets the definition of an edit war because they are going back at each other about religious ethics and eugenics and undoing their revisions.

Textbook edit #1: Principles of Psychological Testing

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Psychological_testing

Proper psychological testing is conducted after vigorous research and development in contrast to quick web-based or magazine questionnaires that say "Find out your Personality Color," or "What's your Inner Age?" Proper psychological testing consists of the following:

Standardization - All procedures and steps must be conducted with consistency and under the same environment to achieve the same testing performance from those being tested.

Objectivity - Scoring is free of subjective judgments or biases based on the fact that the same results are obtained on test from everyone.

Test Norms - The average test score within a large group of people where the performance of one individual can be compared to the results of others by establishing a point of comparison or frame of reference.

Reliability - Obtaining the same result after multiple testing.

Validity - The type of test being administered must measure what it is intended to measure.

^ Schultz & Schultz, Duane (2010). Psychology and work today. New York: Prentice Hall. pp.99-102. ISBN 0-205-68358-4.

Joselv83 (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Textbook edit #2: How to Improve Performance Appraisals

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Performance_appraisal

Although performance appraisals can be so easily biased, there are certain steps that can be taken to improve the evaluations and reduce the margin of errors through the following:

Training - Creating an awareness and acceptance in the people conducting the appraisals that within a group of workers, they will find a wide range in difference of skills and abilities.

Providing Feedback to Raters - Trained raters provide managers who evaluated their subordinates with feedback, including information on ratings from other managers. This reduces leniency errors.

Subordinate Participation - By allowing employee participation in the evaluation process, there is employee-supervisor reciprocity in the discussion for any discrepancies between self ratings and supervisor ratings, thus, increasing job satisfaction and motivation.

^ Schultz & Schultz, Duane (2010). Psychology and work today. New York: Prentice Hall. pp.153. ISBN 0-205-68358-4.

Joselv83 (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)