User:Johnnyw/Sandbox
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]Thank you for submitting the article to the Good Article nomination process. Unfortunately, this article does no yet meet the six good article criteria. This is not an in-depth Good Article review, because the reviewer believes that the article, as of 17:30, Tuesday November 19 2024 (UTC), is not yet ready, because it violates one or more of the Quick fail criteria or is simply not broad in its coverage.
The article lacks substantially of reliable sources, see WP:Verifiability.
The article treats the topic in a non-neutral manner, see WP:Neutral point of view.
The article has any cleanup banners, including but not limited to {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, {{NPOV}}, {{unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{fact}}, {{clarifyme}}, {{huh}}, or similar tags .
The article has been the subject of recent ongoing edit wars.
The article uses copyrighted images which do not meet Wikipedia's fair use policy.
The article lacks in broadness of coverage.
To help you advance the article to GA-status, the reviewer recommends looking at other articles to approach the deficits pointed out above. Please ask if you are in doubt and need a more specific treatment of the problems in your article.
- Wikipedia:The perfect article
- {{{7}}}
Greetings,
Usage
[edit]{{subst:X9|1=|2=|3=|4=|5=|6=|7=}}
Use fail as an arguments for parameters 1 through 6, the quick-fail criteria, and add articles with wikilink as parameter 7. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.
Example
[edit]{{subst:X9|1=fail|2=|3=|4=|5=fail|6=|7=[[Architecture of Houston]]}} ~~~~
results in:
Johnnyw talk 12:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)