User:JoeyCalzo/Brand Engagement/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How Brand Community Practices Create Value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20619045^[1]
- This is a peer-reviewed journal article. So it should be a reliable source. It goes deep into the topic too so should be easy to establish notability.
Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Introduction to the Special Issue: Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 3–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42004266^[2]
- This is a peer-reviewed journal article. So it should be a reliable source. It also goes deep into the topic at hand and should be good for establishing notability.
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162054^[3]
- This article is a peer-reviewed journal. This article is really in depth and gives good information and graphs that can be used to help give notability. It talks about brand relationships impact on brand community.
Goh, K.-Y., Heng, C.-S., & Lin, Z. (2013). Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User-and Marketer-Generated Content. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42004271
- This article is a peer-reviewed journal article, so it should be a reliable source. It talks about social media brand community and consumer behavior. ^[4]
Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009). The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40470395
- This article is a peer-reviewed journal article. And goes very in depth about the process of customer engagement and how brands can work to satisfy customers.^[5]
Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 92–104. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20618873^[6]
- This is a peer-reviewed journal that talks about brand engagement and how it effects market behavior.
Aggarwal, P., & Mcgill, A. L. (2012). When Brands Seem Human, Do Humans Act Like Brands? Automatic Behavioral Priming Effects of Brand Anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1086/662614^[7]
- This a peer-reviewed journal article. So it should be reliable. It is about the power brand exposure may elict automatic behavioral effects consistent with the brand image.
Love, L. F., & Singh, P. (2011). Workplace Branding: Leveraging Human Resources Management Practices for Competitive Advantage Through “Best Employer” Surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 175–181. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474866^[8]
- This is a peer-reviewed journal article. So it should be a reliable source. It talks about brands engaging by surveys for competetitive advantages.