Jump to content

User:Jhill270

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jhill270's Userboxes
This user is on the
debate team.
This user is interested in becoming a lawyer.
25YThis Wikipedian was born on 15 July 1999 and is 25 years, 1 months, and 6 days old.
This user is an atheist.
It is approximately 3:46 PM where this user lives (Brisbane). [refresh]
This user sleeps, but not for predictable amounts of time.
This user is a member of the endangered WikiPuma species. Approach with caution and professional grammar.
saxThis user plays the saxophone.
SBThis user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit weekly.
D:<Nothing annoys this user more than when a teacher says that Wikipedia isn't reliable and that anybody can enter anything completely untrue that'll stay.


How reliable is Wikipedia?

It is pretty good, and getting better. But...

...it is inappropriate to cite Wikipedia as a source, because it is updated in real time. So from the time you cite a Wikipedia page to the time another person looks up your citation, the page may have changed. Citations are usually only applicable to static publications that do not change once they are published. Wikipedia is not a static publication, it is dynamic!‍—‌it changes every minute. In this sense, Wikipedia is not a reliable citable source.

How reliable is Wikipedia as a general resource? Very reliable. Most of the content on Wikipedia is accurate, and many subjects are updated faster than the news. But, Wikipedia is subject to being edited by almost anyone and any time, and the edits may be biased, out of date, incorrect, or malicious (vandalism). Therefore, it is advisable to double-check what you learn in Wikipedia against other sources.

Keep in mind that many volunteers monitor Wikipedia for errors. Since there are so many people reading the articles and monitoring contributions using the Recent Changes page, and using watchlists, incorrect information is usually spotted and corrected quickly.

Some argue that new errors are also introduced all the time, so that the overall accuracy rate is not really improving. Nevertheless, by encouraging people to help with correcting articles, validating content, and providing useful references, errors will eventually be greatly reduced.

The more accurate Wikipedia becomes, the more it attracts additional contributors. It is a self-reinforcing cycle!

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

My foray into Wikipedia

[edit]

I have started my user page just today, and have made some contributions also. Whilst this page isn't much to look at now, I hope to improve it in the future, and to keep editing. I think I will start my Wiki editing by trying fix some of the issues with stubs - Expanding, reducing the number of orphans and adding citations. Jhill270 (talk) 06:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)