User:Jenni.mesa1023/Family (Cooper novel)/Kimannfran Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Jenni.mesa1023
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jenni.mesa1023/Family (Cooper novel)

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? no
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? no
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes; article was yet to be created
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? a little overly detailed; summary should be condensed

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
• Is the content added up-to-date? yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? major themes and characters still need to be added

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? none listed yet
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
• Are the sources current? n/a
• Check a few links. Do they work? n/a

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes; however, should be condensed and introduced through brief description before plot summary
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? very few
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes; again, should be edited to be condensed

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? not yet
• Are images well-captioned? n/a
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? no; sources need to be added
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? n/a
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? n/a
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? n/a

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? needs work but off to a great start
• What are the strengths of the content added? character list is strong; overall synopsis is detailed
• How can the content added be improved? by adding introduction to novel, then condensing down some of the plot summary

Overall evaluation

Great job! Needs secondary sources and editing but off to a great start.