User:JasminBieber 18/sandbox

My Mid-Term Quiz for LIBY 1210-09 Fall 2015

My real name is: Jasmin Linares

My Research Topic is: Music and Religion

Key words related to my Research Topic are: song, christianity, spirituality

Next examine Wikipedia articles that are directly related to your Research Topic and select a substantive article to evaluate. This could be an article about an idea (e.g., I might choose the one about Trance) or a person (if I were researching Reggae music, I might pick Bob Marley). Answer the following questions:

I chose to read and evaluate the article titled: (for extra credit, link the name of the article to the article in Wikipedia.)

Spiritual (music)

Use the criteria from the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure to evaluate the article. (Get your copy from the Reference Desk.)

1. Is there a warning banner at the top of the article? Yes or No: yes

If there is a warning banner, copy and paste the warning banner here.

Write a brief explanation of the reason the issues mentioned in the warning banner are important. For example, if the issue is “needs additional citations for verification,” why does that matter?

"needs additional citations for verification" this matters because that means that the information might not be correct.

Please note: If the article you are evaluating does not have a warning banner, choose a warning banner from a different article and explain the warnings that are in that banner.

2. Is the lead section of the article easy to understand? Does it summarize the key points of the article? Its easy to understand, and it does summarize the key points.

3. Is the structure of the article clear? “Are there several headings and subheadings, images and diagrams at appropriate places, and appendices and foonotes at the end?”

The article has different headings and subheadings, but has no pictures, and it has footnotes.

4. Are “the various aspects of the topic balanced well”? That is does it seem to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic?

The topics do tie in to the main topic of the article.

5. Does the article provide a “neutral point of view”? Does it read like an encyclopedia article instead of a persuasive essay?

It does provide a neutral point of view and its more like an informative typeof writing.

6. Are the references and footnotes citing reliable sources? Do they point to scholarly and trustworthy information? Beware of references to blogs; look for references to books, scholarly journal articles, government sources, etc.

Some of them are articles, others are journals, and others are other articles.

7. Look for these signs of bad quality and comment on their presence or absence from the article you are evaluating:

a. is the lead section well-written, in clear, correct English? it is well written.

b. are there “unsourced opinions” and/or “value statements which are not neutral”? There are one or two unsourced opinions.

c. does the article refer “to ‘some,’ ‘many,’ or other unnamed groups of people,” instead of specific organizations or authors or facts? It talks about slavery, enslaved Africans and about Christian values.

d. does the article seem to omit aspects of the topic? No everything written ties in with the article topic.

e. are some sections overly long compared to other sections of similar importance to the topic? Only one is longer than the other sections.

f. does the article lack sufficient references or footnotes? No it seems to have sufficient references and footnotes through out the article.

g. Look at the Talk Page for the article. As you read the conversation there, do you see hostile dialogue or other evidence of lack of respectful treatment among the editors?

No one is hostile it just seems to have useful advice on how to maybe correct some sections or maybe add some things.