User:Jaf020/Lumber River/MamaUniversee Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? Jaf020
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jaf020/Lumber River
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
- Is the content added up-to-date? yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No all the content added belongs.
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? The content that was added is neutral.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Over represented.
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No the new information does not seem to contain new sources.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources added are links to other wiki pages that are mentioned throughout the original page.
- Are the sources current? Yes
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? The sources are from other wiki pages. Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes the information added is clear and concise
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the information added was added to established sections.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The sections are a little more full which is an overall positive.
- What are the strengths of the content added? Provided detail to the sections edited.
- How can the content added be improved? Don't forget to remove the edit part from the section headings.