User:Jade71u/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Brand loyalty
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: This article has some misspelling and needs more sources.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Yes.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- No.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- It is concise.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Yes.
Is the content up-to-date?
- Yes.
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- No. More content could be added to this page.

Is the article neutral?
- Yes.
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- No.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Some contents didn't have sources.
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes
Are the sources current?
- Yes.
Check a few links. Do they work?
- Some citation doesn't complete.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- It's clear, but could be more easy to read.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Yes.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- It doesn't have many pictures.
Are images well-captioned?
- Yes.
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- I think so.
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- Yes.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- The talk page only has 4 conversations, talking about what they already edited and what would be edited.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- It's rated as C-Class, and it's a part of WikiProject Brands, WikiProject Business, and WikiProject Marketing & Advertising.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- There are only 4 conversations on the talk page, without too many discussions.

What is the article's overall status?
- Need to add more sources.
What are the article's strengths?
- It has several examples to explain the contents.
How can the article be improved?
- Need to add some pictures make it easier to read.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- I think it is could be better.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~