User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)/Maddiedufault Peer Review
Appearance
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Isdewell
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The lead gives good insight into the restaurant and includes some interesting facts that shed light onto the vibe if the restaurant.
- The lead could include brief insight into the contents to be mentioned in the page such as food type and the fact that they have publications.
Content
[edit]- All of the content is very relevant and it is neutral.
- The content is up to date and includes information that makes the cafe unique, such as publications.
- The article does not have any historic facts besides their publication. It would be helpful to include a brief history of the restaurant included when it started and how they have expanded.
Tone and Balance
[edit]- The content is generally neutral, there is a bit of language that could possibly be bias.
- There could be a bit more content in regards to the food options of the restaurant or additional content about ownership and any other notable employees.
Sources and References
[edit]- Yes, all of the sources added are reliable.
- The links and sources work, additionally they are not all published by the restaurant.
Organization
[edit]- The content is very well written, it sounds like a real interview.
- There are no grammatical errors I have found.
- The content is broken down into very ill organized sections. The subsections are also broken down very well in the publications section.
For New Articles Only
[edit]- Yes, the notability requirements are effective and clearly stated.
- The article also includes a section that is clearly stated with the most general information.