User:IRP/Long edit summary

With all of the misinformation out there, it is important to mention the facts as close as possible to the beginning of the article, as many people who fall for this hoax may come here looking for reassurance, and in a panicked state, they will tire out from reading it rather quickly, so it is important to mention it upfront, and THEN give the long explanation about all of the rejection by the scholars. Additionally, I have piled it up with a truckload of reliable references to back up my statements. If this many reliable sources show that it is a hoax, then that's enough to downright overtly express it as a hoax, at the beginning of the article, just like these reliable sources do (it's the first thing they mention).